edd_jedi said:
Happy to go up to third but I don't think it will last long with Chelsea and City still to play. I would take 4th right now. The final score against Bournemouth was flattering, I would have taken 2-1 at half time, they were making all the same mistakes as against Juve in the first half. I think Spurs are really missing Alderweireld, not sure what's going on with him, surely he can't just decide he doesn't want to play any more?
Agreed, Spurs still have City to play, you would expect City to win that. Pool and Spurs both have Chelsea. It's gonna be close between the sides who finish 2nd-4th/5th.
As for Alderweireld, my understanding is that he is stalling over a new contract and Pochetino has a default setting whereby he won't pick anyone who is running down his contract. I can see Poch's logic, but it does seem to be cutting your nose off to spite your face.
Snaketibe said:
I didn't see that game, so I have no idea how deserved Utd's victory was, but I'm not complaining!
Twasn't a classic. Though I doubt Utd fans care. TBF I wouldn't have cared if Liverpool had won a non classic either.
Both Utd's goals were actually straight out of the Fat Sam book of tactics. Long hoof up field by DDG towards Lukaku who made Lovern his bitch (I suspect that performance, especially those 2 daft tackles within 5 seconds of each other late in the second half, are the final nail in Lovern's Pool career. Hopefully he will now join Mingers and Moreno on the bench and be sold to first idiots who offer money for him), he flicked it on and Rashford twatted it into the net. Both good finishes from Rashford. Second one dropped to Mata who was tackled before it dropped to Rashy, but basically the same goal as the first. Mata also missed a glorious chance with an overhead that would have settled the game.
Second half was a bit weird. I wouldn't call it "all Liverpool" but they did monopolise possession and spent large chunks of the half camped 10-15 yards outside Utd's box. Sterile possession. Utd had a few half chances on the break. Pool, for all their possession, couldn't break down Utd's back four and the midfield. Not sure I'd call it 'parking the bus' that would be a tad unfair, but it definitely wasn't the Utd of old. Fergy's Utd would have continued to attack. Jose's Utd are much more pragmatic. I guess it was more of a "we're 2-0 up, we don't need to attack, you come and try and break us down."
Pool's forward line was poor. Mane was Utd's best player. He lost the ball every single time he got it. Saying that it is hard to break down a defence that sits on the edge of its box (and leaves the wings free knowing Pool won't fire in crosses) with the midfield camped on top of it, and Liverpool's forwards in there as well. It was eye of needle stuff. Pool created the sum total of FA squared in the game. Their goal was a gift, and probably the best finish of the game lol.
It's a hard game to describe really. I wouldn't say Utd were the better side as such, it was more a case of Utd did just enough to win. That's also not me saying pool were the better side. It was just a bit of a meh game. Not a dreadful borefest as feared but far from a classic either.
I still think Jose is doing the bare minimum at Utd, given the money he has had and the players he has, but I suspect most Utd fans will tolerate substance over style or results/wins over gloriously entertaining football as long as he keeps winning trophies or at least getting them into the CL. Still, for me as a Liverpool fan, Utd as a team/club should be about more than just doing enough, but then I'm not a neutral.