Really? Not sure I would class his season so far as a success. It's not been a failure, but there is a rather large area between the two. Although if you look at social media you wouldn't think it.
I don't judge Ronaldo by normal standards, cos he isn't a normal player. The guy is a freak. Judging him by his standards this season has been a bit below par. Still good enough to keep most normal PL strikers happy, but he is not normal. He's still done better than Messi at PSG mind.
I would say age is starting to catch up with him. No shame in that, it happens to everyone, and being in such a **** Utd team doesn't help him. But I struggle to see how you can argue he has shut up his critics. The best you can say is he has done 'ok' that's not gonna shut up his critics.
I gotta disagree on Utd being out of the CL without his goals too. In the literal sense, if you take his goals off, "yes" Utd would be out. BUT you are either assuming he plays the full 90 and does nothing or whoever played in his place would not have contributed anything. In the case of the latter chances are the games would have been totally different if someone else played in his place. Utd could have lost 100-0 or won 15-14, we'll never know. That's why I don't like those assumptions. Yes, he has scored some very important goals for Utd in the CL, but if he was not there the games would have been totally different. If he had played and done FA I doubt OGS would continued to pick him, so we are back to the 'someone else playing' argument.
You can't just deduct his contributions and not add any on for his replacement. Kinda like saying if DDG hadn't played you would have shipped every shot on target. In the literal sense, if you played without a keeper, you would have. But you obviously would have played Henderson who is a solid keeper and may well have saved just as many as DDG.
VAR rant time.
How the **** did the Brighton keeper stay on yesterday? Apparently VAR couldn't see any angle that showed whether there was contact. Genuinely, that is what they said. EVERY SINGLE ANGLE BT showed was crystal clear there was contact.
VAR is not the issue, the incompetent referees are the issue. If you can't watch that and see it's a crystal clear red, you shouldn't be a professional referee.
Judge for yourselves, anyone think there might have been contact here?
Also, that Harry Maguire OG, now I don't rate Harry, never have, never will, but he ONLY plays the ball cos he know the Spurs CF is there. Surely that is the definition of 'interfering with play'? As someone who knows more about footy than me once said, "If my player isn't interfering with play, what is he doing on the pitch?"
I feel dirty saying Utd shouldn't have conceded there, but that rule is utter bollocks.