How good was the first half of the Chelsea Liverpool game, I bet
@weasel thought you had it sewn up after 15 minutes! Great comeback and a shame the second half was a bit of an anticlimax
Summed up well. Albeit I didn't enjoy it as much ad you neutrals. I'm really disappointed in James Milner for conceding the foul for the first goal. There is no need to foul him, stay on your feet and the ball goes out for a goal kick. He's 36 years old and is normally a very switched on player. That one daft foul, he even had a nibble before he cleaned him, is what Chelsea scored from to get back into the game. And it was some dig too.
If you are 2-0 up away from home against a title rival you REALLY can't afford to blow that lead in 3 minutes right before half time. That's the second time this season Pool have let a two goal lead slip and ended up drawing (Brighton was the other one) those four points and the game in hand suddenly mean there is something approximating a title race. Without them, it's City's to try and lose.
That's also the second time Pool have had Chelsea where they want them and not won. Against someone like City you can not afford to drop points like that.
Pool were SOOOOO easy to play through for chunks of that second half. That's not a good thing, nor is it unique to yesterday.
On another note, Pool now have 11 players unavailable, Alison, Matip, Firmino (Covid), Salah, Mane, Keita (AFCON), Thiago, Minamino, Origi, Phillips, and Elliott all injured. From their 25 man squad that leaves 14 players plus kids. If Pool were Newcastle or certain other PL sides they would be asking for a postponement. I think Chelsea are/were similarly affected.
How City have escaped with minimal covid and injuries is beyond me, they must be due an outbreak. That's the only hope for anything approximating a title race. Even then, with their squad, and finances…….