Kids are home sick so I am having "CSI Chewseum" with them. They are having a blast, so there is at least something good coming out of this!
Our analysis has focused on the 4 65 Ds that I have. One cardback, one carded Chewie, one touched up miscard Chewie/Vader, and one beaten up miscard Madine/Vader.
Here are our findings:
1: The Madine seems the least likely to be a counterfit for the following reasons.
-it has price sticker residue
-the bubble is slightly yellowed
-the general hue of the card varies drastically from the other three (more on that later)
2: There are no readily apparent repeated printing errors among the 4, but I am not Mattias so it could just be that my slower American eyes can't see it.
3: My son immediately noted the "crescent" on my Vader / Chewie miscard, so that appears to be a modern seal (we shouldn't call them reseals, right? I mean, they were never sealed in the first place.
4: They all have the sharpied out line on the back. Has anyone else mentioned this? This seems to definitely end the debate about whether or not the unused cardbacks could be proofs. Why do that on a proof? Though, why would Toni sell unused carbacks in addition to carded versions? It seems that it is not very wise.
5: Similarly, what is the deal with them all being punched? The cardbacks are not punched but the carded are. So, did he do this to make it seem more "real." Seems strange. Or, were some punched and others unpunched?
6: As mentioned previously, there seems to be a slight color difference. The Madine, which I presume to be real, is much greener. Perhaps this is from a different batch than the Toni case?
I will post two pictures below. The first will be the mod-sealed vader with the crescent and the other will be the Madine with the greener hue.