theforceuk said:
I can see Arsenal winning the Europa League and steeling the 4th place champions league spot. Would be funny if Spurs, Chelsea, Arsenal and Liverpool missed out though. Really can't see it. Still think Liverpool and Chelsea will do it.
EL is an additional CL spot, so it has no bearing on the race for 4th.
edd_jedi said:
I'm confused by the uproar around Son yesterday too, the United player clearly poked him in the face, and accident or not, it was a foul! The fact a goal happened to go in afterwards is irrelevant, it would have been a penalty for us at the other end of the pitch.
Really?
That's NEVER a foul for me, and I am far far from being a Utd fan. Yes, there is (or looks to be) contact, but ehhh it's a contact sport. Son tries to grab McTomminay and he goes to hand him off. Happens a hundred times a game. Just cos Son falls over holding his face it's a foul? If he handed him off on his forehead and Son didn't fall over, is it still a foul!?
For me that epitomises what's wrong with football and VAR in particular. Man the **** up Son and everyone plays on. Anyone who thinks that is a foul (Spurs fans aside) is turning football into ballet.
That was another shocking weekend for VAR. Between the two goals, for Wolves and Pool, disallowed for a millimetre of someone's arm appearing to be offside (surely when it is that close the fact you can't be 100% sure when the ball leaves someone's foot and the fact cameras aren't super mega ultra high definition, means the margin of error must be a lot more than the off or on-side you are giving!? Either way, it needs scrapped or majorly over hauled), the non penalty for Newcastle when the Burnley boy boots the ball and the Newcastle player heads it (pretty sure Mane got a red card for that a few yrs ago against City and I said then I didn't mind if there was consistency but I knew there wouldn't be, since then, ehhh I don't think anyone else has been sent off for it. Indeed the Burnley boy wasn't even penalised. Yes, Mane booted him in the face and it was a red. But there was no intent and he was looking at the ball, there was no intent from the Burnley boy and he was looking at the ball too. Thus is it only a red if you bust someone? Why then do players get sent off for "Leg breakers" that ehhh don't break a players leg? "Intent" is irrelevant. It's the inconsistency that bugs.)
Then we get the disallowed Utd goal. Which is just a nonsense.
Either VAR/the people operating it is scrapped/trained properly, or football will find fans leaving in droves.
I can't remember a single change that has been a bad for the game.
Almost every fan I know thinks VAR needs scrapped or reformed. The best anyone says is that the people operating it are the problem. Regardless, it is almost universally unpopular. The football authorities have really ****ed this one up.
Robstyley said:
What a great afternoon of football. Important win beating Leicester and another three points for the Hammers. And Spurs lost, got taken apart by Man U in the 2nd half. We've got a good chance of top four now I reckon looking at the remaining games
What's WH's run in like? From memory Pool and Spurs, or was it Chelsea, have the "best" run ins. It's gonna be close that's for sure.
Jessie lingard, can't get a game at Utd, cos when he does he is turd, he goes to WH and scores 8 in 9. That's one hell of a turn around.
What odds he ends up at WH permanently next yr along with 30-40m and Declan Rice goes to Utd!?
Utd dont really need another deep midfielder, but since when did logic come into Utd's transfers!?