michael plum said:
Toni is a regular at Sandown. He doesn't stand but he does enter as an early buyer, regular as clockwork. He may not have much time to search for more loose figures, though.
What's this going to do to prices? The wretched home-sealed pieces must have some sort of value, but if everyone starts baling out what percentage can we expect to recoup?
And what about the additional drop in prices caused by the loss of confidence? Add to that the collectors who leave in disgust and you have the biggest setback in toy collecting that I can ever recall.
Seriously, can anyone tell me of a greater blow to the hobby?
These are all very valid concerns. Having experienced similar setbacks in the vintage comic hobby, with the most recent scandal starting in March of 2013 and running through to the summer, there really is no clean cut solution. What results is a debasing of items bearing even the slightest resemblance to a tainted sample. With all the tells Jason has uncovered, even one or two things off about an MOC (even though it might have been produced that way) will arouse suspicion.
What I can also tell you, as far as how things usually play out, is that these MOC's will be worth nothing. Any unused cardbacks will be worth nothing (they are rejects, and connected to a massive scandal). The blisters - maybe Toni could use them as cups to drink gutter water, which is where he needs to end up, if he isn't strung by the nuts and used as shark chum first.
Certification companies (AFA/UKG) will lead the charge with his banning, and suspension of grading these items, which in essence will produce a non-existent demand for people to own existing certified examples, and even less interest in getting a qualified grade.
The other travesty is the sellers out there who are trying to dump this stuff on the market. Who are seemingly following the lead of the person who revealed all this, and who himself likely dumped all this stuff over the years, and never had the decency to even notify the people he sold this garbage to that they're tainted.
Say what you think, but only if you believe what you are saying. And follow-up with the behavour to the espoused belief. If you say one thing and practice the exact opposite in this situation, you're a scumbag. Past, present, or future. I don't see it any other way.
The community's only reprieve is to make sure these scumbags are outed every time, no matter how often they change their online aliases, and found, outed and shamed wherever they're next scams are perpetrated. my2cents