Long Time suspected FAKE baggies scam / seller

SublevelStudios

Sith Lord
Joined
Oct 17, 2013
Messages
2,598
Frunkstar said:
Please can we ALL set aside any petty squabbling & try to concentrate on the matter at hand, which is making the hobby a safe & enjoyable one for us all by removing fakes from it.

Sure, happy with that, let's move on and try and gain a positive outcome. But posting stuff like this is not helpful:

Whats already been posted BTW is still only the tip of the iceberg, so where are all those naysayers & ****-slingers now?? - thanks for all the apologies BTW - figures

Don't ever recall slinging any ****, and I would have spoken up for anyone based on the OP.
 

Bonsai_Tree_Ent

Jedi Master
Joined
Jun 26, 2012
Messages
985
pencil.jpg
 

edd_jedi

Moderator
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
Oct 19, 2006
Messages
8,898
Location
UK
I can understand Frank's frustrations having put so much effort in to this and getting a backlash initially, but I'm sure everybody was just trying to see the good in people and we all concede more evidence in the first post would have helped.

Let's try and save the retrospective on how it was handled until after it's all sorted.
 

Frunkstar

Grand Master
Joined
Sep 5, 2007
Messages
5,653
Location
North Wales - Beyond The Outer Rim!
I also wanted to just take the opportunity to thank all those that have remained objective & positive through the messy & troubling parts of this thread & given some moral support when it was needed most, I salute you & really do appreciate it.

As for my other more negative post earlier, I must apologize as it was a little out of character & I hope you will forgive me, it's been a hell of a week with many members demanding info & evidence non now now when it was not fully ready to post in a clear concise format & the rather rushed podcast just made everyone scream for all of the supporting evidence immediately which was not all collated & is still being looked at, the week was topped of with a major leak from my back boiler / heating system on Friday which created many many hours work & a very cold house with no heating or water whatsoever & 3 kids to keep happy & healthy, that coupled with the fact that 3 member's of the investigation team are off ill (2 seriously) there was a break in for another & one is on Holiday just further delayed info being put forward more quickly, but hey thats life, timing is never right, I am currently still without water or heating in winter.

Please also try to bear in mind that although there are 15 members on the investigation team many are never going to post here as they were brought on for specific reasons, many of them being regarding just single items or subjects matters & are not baggie collectors per se.

Many thanks again for your patience folks, more will be put forward shortly & I still extend the olive branch to Jeff to come on here & please explain his side of the story & back up his explanation with some facts & corroborating evidence of those facts as if this is a simple case of not knowing enough about the items being sold & being trickle fed bad product it would swath away at bear minimum the reason for us wondering if they are being manufactured to order as it would seem by what we have seen to date with the mounting evidence at hand.
 

maxf

Jedi Master
Joined
Mar 16, 2015
Messages
964
Frank - Thanks for all of your hard work. I was initially a little critical as the evidence didnt seem to be totally there - I'm fully behind you now.

As I see it:

Best case - Jeff is a shady seller.
Mid case - Jeff is knowingly selling fake baggies, possibly linked to the person/persons making them.
Worst case - Jeff is making them.
 

Frunkstar

Grand Master
Joined
Sep 5, 2007
Messages
5,653
Location
North Wales - Beyond The Outer Rim!
maxf said:
Frank - Thanks for all of your hard work. I was initially a little critical as the evidence didnt seem to be totally there - I'm fully behind you now.

Not you at all Max I thought your posts were well thought out & you made some valid points, I think the biggest headache has been Joe (finestcomics) as we all know (sorry Edd), the argumentative confrontational nature of that particular members posts made getting on with this more promptly like wading through waist high treacle for a while.

maxf said:
As I see it:

Best case - Jeff is a shady seller.
Mid case - Jeff is knowingly selling fake baggies, possibly linked to the person/persons making them.
Worst case - Jeff is making them.

Think that about sums things up
 

Andyclarke

Sith Lord
Joined
May 11, 2011
Messages
1,139
A big thanks to Frank and the team for all the effort and investigatory skills shown in what must have been conducted under very stressful circumstances. I'm no baggie collector but appreciate the impact this will have on a big part of our hobby. I feel very sorry for anyone (victims) who have unknowingly purchased these fraudulent figures. It really is a horrible situation.
 

finestcomics

Padawan
Joined
Jan 16, 2013
Messages
173
Frunkstar said:
Not you at all Max I thought your posts were well thought out & you made some valid points, I think the biggest headache has been Joe (finestcomics) as we all know (sorry Edd), the argumentative confrontational nature of that particular members posts made getting on with this more promptly like wading through waist high treacle for a while.

I had left this thread for dead for reasons the site admin crossed the line in addressing my participation and involvement, but since you keep bringing me up repeatedly...

I only insisted on a revising the first post since two members of the investigation stated it was not going to be proven that Jeff made them. I wasn't the only person to remark in this thread that there was still a mention in the OP inferring he did. I asked three times for that revision, and even had to supply a screengrab because apparently it wasn't something anyone remembered you writing.

The request for clarification on the Fett baggie was because discussion began to emerge about culling these, and possibly destroying them or taking them out of circulation. As the original post made no specific mention if the touch-ups were the extent, I asked if the seals were factory originals. It was also suggested in the pdocast Jeff was going to send these off to UKG - my thought here was if Stephen Ward could confirm the seals were legit, I could offer to assess if a safe removal of the touch-ups was possible. In doing so, these would not be "fake" any longer. Again, this only made sense if the seals were correct - I wasn't asking for that to be answered on the spot if the person responding was unsure, but did ask for clarification for a reason.

If asking these things in an attempt to save something vintage from being destroyed, and trying to find a positive in this sordid situation makes me a troll, so be it.

But that was my intent. What you call argumentative overlooks the fact I was asking for clarification. I ask you to refrain from painting a picture here of something that isn't - repeating falsehoods doesn't make it any more true.

I'm done here.
 

Ross_Barr

Jedi Knight
Joined
Feb 2, 2014
Messages
258
maxf said:
Frank - Thanks for all of your hard work. I was initially a little critical as the evidence didnt seem to be totally there - I'm fully behind you now.

As I see it:

Best case - Jeff is a shady seller.
Mid case - Jeff is knowingly selling fake baggies, possibly linked to the person/persons making them.
Worst case - Jeff is making them.

Agree that Frank deserves the prize for Community Member of the Year, or SWF.UK member of the year, at minimum. :D

Also glad to see you reach the same conclusion I posted on page 6, Max. You unoriginal bastard. Lol. Love you bro!

Ross_Barr said:
FFS people, it is clear these all came from Jeff (and perhaps it is now clear that he knew some were fake because Frank told him and then maybe still sold those same ones on), so that leads logically to only the following conclusions: (1) Jeff was making these in his basement in true Toy Toni fashion; (2) Jeff was so grossly irresponsible in not knowing that he was buying dozens and dozens of fake baggies and then selling on to others, but didn't actually make the baggies himself; or (3) Jeff reprehensibly knew he had tons of fake baggies that were bought elsewhere (i.e., he didn't make them himself) once he was told so, but sold them on to others anyway.

In any of (1) - (3), the dude should have been called out and this issue brought to light not only so people would know that these are out there, but also to avoid buying any more from Jeff.
 

darth_daddius

Jedi Knight
Joined
Apr 1, 2014
Messages
413
Location
Australia
finestcomics said:
Frunkstar said:
Not you at all Max I thought your posts were well thought out & you made some valid points, I think the biggest headache has been Joe (finestcomics) as we all know (sorry Edd), the argumentative confrontational nature of that particular members posts made getting on with this more promptly like wading through waist high treacle for a while.

I had left this thread for dead for reasons the site admin crossed the line in addressing my participation and involvement, but since you keep bringing me up repeatedly...

I only insisted on a revising the first post since two members of the investigation stated it was not going to be proven that Jeff made them. I wasn't the only person to remark in this thread that there was still a mention in the OP inferring he did. I asked three times for that revision, and even had to supply a screengrab because apparently it wasn't something anyone remembered you writing.

The request for clarification on the Fett baggie was because discussion began to emerge about culling these, and possibly destroying them or taking them out of circulation. As the original post made no specific mention if the touch-ups were the extent, I asked if the seals were factory originals. It was also suggested in the pdocast Jeff was going to send these off to UKG - my thought here was if Stephen Ward could confirm the seals were legit, I could offer to assess if a safe removal of the touch-ups was possible. In doing so, these would not be "fake" any longer. Again, this only made sense if the seals were correct - I wasn't asking for that to be answered on the spot if the person responding was unsure, but did ask for clarification for a reason.

If asking these things in an attempt to save something vintage from being destroyed, and trying to find a positive in this sordid situation makes me a troll, so be it.

But that was my intent. What you call argumentative overlooks the fact I was asking for clarification. I ask you to refrain from painting a picture here of something that isn't - repeating falsehoods doesn't make it any more true.

I'm done here.

I usually don't get into this stuff, but I'm afraid this has pushed me and I just don't buy it Joe. You were pretty happy to (very rightly) call out Adolfo and be cranky at people defending him on RS: http://forum.rebelscum.com/showthread.php?t=1118796

However, when Frank - a very respected member of this forum - mans up to call Jeff out you were pretty scathing and unsupportive. On any other day, this would have been a 'Watch Out' post within which we always beg for names, etc. With the scale of the potential deception I think Frank, Edd and the guys did a stellar job. And, as it turns out, they were right on the money.

You were being pedantic. Regardless of whether he was manufacturing them or not, he was still knowingly selling fakes. The fact is, you got a bee in your bonnet (as you did with the Adolfo thread) and leapt in with all guns blazing. You may be done Joe, but the right thing to do is learn from it and say 'Oops - sorry'.
 

edd_jedi

Moderator
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
Oct 19, 2006
Messages
8,898
Location
UK
I think the big point you were missing Joe is that this was not a touch up. A touch up is restoring something that was there before, eg colouring a tear in a cardback black again. The Kenner text on the Fett baggie was painted white to make it look like an ESB-B bag - it had no white on it before. That is not a touch up, it's trying to change the appearance/type of the bag. As many others seemed to agree, that falls under the umbrella of fake, not simply restoration.

Apologies for calling you a troll but at the time our energy could have been spent better elsewhere than arguing over the definition of fake.
 

finestcomics

Padawan
Joined
Jan 16, 2013
Messages
173
edd_jedi said:
I think the big point you were missing Joe is that this was not a touch up. A touch up is restoring something that was there before, eg colouring a tear in a cardback black again. The Kenner text on the Fett baggie was painted white to make it look like an ESB-B bag - it had no white on it before. That is not a touch up, it's trying to change the appearance/type of the bag. As many others seemed to agree, that falls under the umbrella of fake, not simply restoration.

Apologies for calling you a troll but at the time our energy could have been spent better elsewhere than arguing over the definition of fake.

Thanks Edd, and I apologize as well as it wasn't my intention to ruffle feathers. FWIW I appreciate you adding more context. If I didn't see a case for restoration removal, I woudn't have even bothered, but there is a chance (only if those seals are original) to return the baggie back to its original unaltered state. I've worked with paper and plastic and have a higher degree of confidence with the latter. Again, it was just meant as a way to find a positive out of this whole mess.

I'll leave it to you guys to carry on with this.
 

theguiltyone

Sith Lord
Joined
Apr 12, 2007
Messages
1,012
Location
Essex
Some of you here know me although most these days I suspect not.
I am part of the investigation group but I did request to have my name removed from the original post for the following reasons only:

Inclusion of the accusation that Jeff was making the baggies.
Inclusion of his photograph, any photos I took at FF were for the groups use only.
Inclusion that Palitoy Ks were under suspicion when UKG have graded some already, I believe this style needs a lot more looking into.


Focus on the evidence the guys have presented since the OP, there is a lot to take on board.

marc
 

xbomber

Padawan
Joined
May 13, 2015
Messages
94
darth_daddius said:
finestcomics said:
Frunkstar said:
Not you at all Max I thought your posts were well thought out & you made some valid points, I think the biggest headache has been Joe (finestcomics) as we all know (sorry Edd), the argumentative confrontational nature of that particular members posts made getting on with this more promptly like wading through waist high treacle for a while.

I had left this thread for dead for reasons the site admin crossed the line in addressing my participation and involvement, but since you keep bringing me up repeatedly...

I only insisted on a revising the first post since two members of the investigation stated it was not going to be proven that Jeff made them. I wasn't the only person to remark in this thread that there was still a mention in the OP inferring he did. I asked three times for that revision, and even had to supply a screengrab because apparently it wasn't something anyone remembered you writing.

The request for clarification on the Fett baggie was because discussion began to emerge about culling these, and possibly destroying them or taking them out of circulation. As the original post made no specific mention if the touch-ups were the extent, I asked if the seals were factory originals. It was also suggested in the pdocast Jeff was going to send these off to UKG - my thought here was if Stephen Ward could confirm the seals were legit, I could offer to assess if a safe removal of the touch-ups was possible. In doing so, these would not be "fake" any longer. Again, this only made sense if the seals were correct - I wasn't asking for that to be answered on the spot if the person responding was unsure, but did ask for clarification for a reason.

If asking these things in an attempt to save something vintage from being destroyed, and trying to find a positive in this sordid situation makes me a troll, so be it.

But that was my intent. What you call argumentative overlooks the fact I was asking for clarification. I ask you to refrain from painting a picture here of something that isn't - repeating falsehoods doesn't make it any more true.

I'm done here.

I usually don't get into this stuff, but I'm afraid this has pushed me and I just don't buy it Joe. You were pretty happy to (very rightly) call out Adolfo and be cranky at people defending him on RS: http://forum.rebelscum.com/showthread.php?t=1118796

However, when Frank - a very respected member of this forum - mans up to call Jeff out you were pretty scathing and unsupportive. On any other day, this would have been a 'Watch Out' post within which we always beg for names, etc. With the scale of the potential deception I think Frank, Edd and the guys did a stellar job. And, as it turns out, they were right on the money.

You were being pedantic. Regardless of whether he was manufacturing them or not, he was still knowingly selling fakes. The fact is, you got a bee in your bonnet (as you did with the Adolfo thread) and leapt in with all guns blazing. You may be done Joe, but the right thing to do is learn from it and say 'Oops - sorry'.

Can we focus back on the topic at hand now as opposed to unrelated incidents and how people should or shouldn't have reacted to the initial bombshell?
 

lee gray

Sith Lord
Joined
Oct 25, 2006
Messages
2,836
This use to be a happy place.
I have just reread every post inc mine for the past 4 hours.

I can understand Frank being annoyed when he was exposing a scammer and alot of people didnt give him any slack.

Rereading my posts my biggest concern was Jeff should be able to defend himself where hes a member but always stated in several of those same posts that he could be dodgy or guilty and never once said he was innocent.

Again it comes down to what we knew then and what we know now.

I have always liked Frank and think Frank is cool and think his ID is great.

Now although i wasnt a **** slinger or a nayer i may have come across a bit uncooperative which i appologize to Frank for.

You have done a great job Frank and the others who shall not be called the team as momike dont like lol and no matter what Jeff may say or do now theres just too much evidence against him.
 

80s_collector

Padawan
Joined
Mar 30, 2015
Messages
181
Basically, look at all the baggies for sale throughout the world, loads of them, look on the internet, at the shows, all over the world theres many of them on the market and there has been so many for sale over the last 15 years or a bit longer..........why....?

Simple, because people started collecting them and wanted mint figures in a sealed plastic bag and were willing to pay big bucks for them because people believe they are rare......theyre not rare they are unique as most were never put into production by the toy companies, they have been or still are being made and this has been happening for 15-20 years on and off due to the fact that the market is full of collectors willing to pay and find something nobody else has got.

Back in the day as you all say, in the 1980s, early 90s, there wasnt any hardly.....apart from the American playset figures, early bird figures and a few different mail away issues........none of them were about.

Years ago Ive sold many sealed cases of the normal baggies, emperors, anakins, dengars, a few fetts, 100s of loose ones and ones in their white card boxes, mixed cases, many bought from warehouses, from collections, dealers and on market stalls too, but sorry to say there were no last 17 figures (unless they came out of playsets) there were never the variants there is on the market today and that isnt cos now we have the internet and the world is small, its always been small and the internet just made it faster......Back in the day we had Toy Shop newspapers, loads of mags from here and abroard, we still dealt across the globe using bankers drafts and telephones......

The Toy shop newspaper was £100 a year for a subscription and was like a printed version of Ebay.

Go back to the 80s/90s and consider one main point, when any baggie was £1, £2 or maybe a fiver.......tons came to the surface due to the fact that nobody could give them away basically, but only the normal 15-30 different ones surfaced that we still see today, nobody wanted them, nobody cared about that little bag with writing on it, the items were basically worthless............but years later there is a market and where there are takers, there will be makers and thats the world we live in.

So many of the baggies on the market today could have been made yesterday, 40 years ago or 15 years ago, who knows.....I personally never had a customer base for baggies years ago, but I know a few people who thankfully arent in the game now who used to buy any baggies off me years ago and in front of my own eyes they would swap the figures around.

So good luck to the buyers and the seller and hopefully everyone will end up smiling again......its toys afterall...

P.S Always stick to buying Vintage Star Wars carded figures from very reputable long term dealers and you wont go far wrong... :D
 

Ian_C

Jedi Master
Joined
Oct 20, 2014
Messages
569
Location
Caledonia, Ontario, Canada
80s_collector said:
P.S Always stick to buying Vintage Star Wars carded figures from very reputable long term dealers and you wont go far wrong... :D

With all due respect, this thread is about what you just said.

It seems that until this past week, Jeff was considered a "very reputable dealer".

Before him (and not saying they are 100% the same), Toy Toni was pretty reputable too. Same with Scott McWilliams, Billy Boy, etc.

All of the above have certainly "gone wrong".

Ian
 

Michael Sith

Grand Master
Supporter
Joined
Mar 2, 2013
Messages
8,769
Location
Up North
To nail your colours to the mast,
And suffer slings and arrows your way cast,
Is testament to commitment and to seeing things through,
To put forward a message that is plain and true,
Many would turn aside, or on the way falter,
If that was the case then things would not alter,
Thank you for bringing your case to the fore,
Even though it may shake the hobby to its core,
Truth will tell as it does in the end,
Hats of to those who principle and moral will defend.
 

tiefighterboy

Grand Master
Joined
Jan 22, 2008
Messages
11,131
Location
Michigan USA
So all baggies are fake unless they surfaced during the pre internet toyshop magazine days??? Not sure about that. Was collecting back in those days and while baggies were cheap so was a bunch of other things. Hell so much stuff surfaces daily that was unknown about back then it is mind boggling. I would not go so far as to say what we knew of back then is it and everything else is recently manufactured..even baggies.
 

80s_collector

Padawan
Joined
Mar 30, 2015
Messages
181
tiefighterboy said:
So all baggies are fake unless they surfaced during the pre internet toyshop magazine days??? Not sure about that. Was collecting back in those days and while baggies were cheap so was a bunch of other things. Hell so much stuff surfaces daily that was unknown about back then it is mind boggling. I would not go so far as to say what we knew of back then is it and everything else is recently manufactured..even baggies.

Oh yes I agree with you all the way on that one, I dont say Ive seen it all by a long way and your right, things surface across the world daily...

What I was really stating was that back in the day when so many SW items were readily available that we only saw the normal production items and a few items from sales reps, kenner or palitoy staff etc,etc and using the baggies as a good example we only saw a small selection of the baggies back then that are on the market in later years.

For example its like saying that years ago there were 96 different production figures on the market.......but now there are 500 different ones, why wouldnt we have seen the other 404 figures years ago.....if a product was made in 1977, you would see at least one in 1978, 79, 80 and 1981.....but when they only turn up on the market 20 or 30 years later you would wonder why..
 
Old Thread: Hello . There have been no replies in this thread for 365 days.
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant.
Perhaps it would be better to start a new thread instead.

Latest posts

Top Bottom