Yet another AFA abortion

Frunkstar

Grand Master
Joined
Sep 5, 2007
Messages
5,735
Location
North Wales - Beyond The Outer Rim!
Spot the school boy error here :? & folk still like to maintain AFA are the be all & end all when it comes to grading.

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Star-Wars-Nien-Nunb-ESB-C-AFA-85-Bag-Baggy-Baggie-Kenner-Vintage-1983-/200917150931?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item2ec7986cd3

This really is IMHO laughable
 
Oh padowans, I must go back to my training & get you all re educated :lol:

This is a total cock up on the part of AFA as the baggie is clearly a palitoy not a Kenner as jorn has suggested, this one came either in a Palitoy or Toltoys single figure mailer.

This (IMO) should be blatantly obvious to the (cough cough) "collectible toy professionals" at the grading company, what a farce & yet another nail in the coffin for those fools (IMO)
angelloose.gif
 
Well it should have been blatantly obvious to the guys at AFA as the ONLY Kenner issued baggie to be resealed without the Kenner Logo on are first issued SW baggies.

SW-a/b/d & e with the exception of the SW-c which sported the Kenner logo along with General Mills logo, so in short there is no know example of a kenner issued baggie with blue print without the logo - simple
 
So I can see the kenner baggie error (now that it's been pointed out on those in the know about baggies), but is the ESB writing incorrect as well (seeming it's a Jedi figure although was it on offer one from the ESB days?)?
 
I was on the ESB thing too...

Come on Frank, we need more training before being able to spot the difference between a Palitoy and Kenner baggie, especially as it hasn't got Palitoy written on it in big blue letters :lol:
 
Old Thread: Hello . There have been no replies in this thread for 365 days.
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant.
Perhaps it would be better to start a new thread instead.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom