Dr Dengar
Padawan
Here we go... 8)
Cheers
olisuds said:Lol, here we go
(Subtle) paint differences, which are difficult to grasp with camera. Sorry no bright yellow boots or burgundy cape here, but still differences - Sorry Marco I dont see anything other than faded paint and play wear
The middle figure is pretty faded indeed. I made the comparisson between the left (Kenner) and right (from Spain) figure. As said, subtle differences (e.g. green of the chest, visor).
![]()
Unique diferences?, I don't know - Well its kind of important. If they're not unique then it means nothing.
Difficult to claim that the differences are unique when I compared the Spanish Fett to only to a small number (6) of Kenner Fetts. I don't want to jump to conclusions, and like to keep it open and unbiased.
A Spanish childhood collection origin. The collection contained many confirmed POCH figures, Han Hoth chocolate, Rebel Soldier, Luke Bespin translucent face - Irrelevant - this is not evidence. We know that many figures sold in Spain were imported from Asia and are the same as US Kenner. Coming from a childhood collection does not make them POCH in the same way that figures from childhood collections in the UK cannot be called Palitoy variants.
Correct, it is not proof - who said so? - just an indication, which together with the other indications fuels the idea the figure might be POCH.
Another one being that the figure pops up in more Spanish collections.
POCH-like imperfections - Once again these do not define a variant so can we move away from discussing factory errors and poor QC.
Same argument.
Sorry Marco but I dont see anything in this and I think we'd be clutching at straws in calling this even a variant let alone a POCH figure.
So you think it is not a variant. You might be wright, I don't have problems with that. Just testing my idea.
For me the whole purpose of having a discusson thread is to hear other views and hopefully getting some more info which brings us further.
I agree on the Death Star Commander description on the TIG page you referred too - its a shame that the diagram you posted did not refer to these traits just more factory error talk - its not helping the cause!
If the diagrams are distracting and put readers on the wrong trail - i.e. they start to look for melt marks etc, instead of paint differences - I better remove them. Sometimes more is less. What do others think?
Cheers