U grade piss takes

Maulster79 said:
http://forum.rebelscum.com/t1083408/#post18863494

Dunno who wrote it but i hope members in the community have a chatter about it.....

Lol - bets on how long that will stay up there !

To be honest I expected a warning for making a non-sales comment in a sles thread !
 
The most eye opening thing about that thread was learning that Robbie appears to be a religious man who picks and choses which parts of the bible are apt and valid and which parts are not. ie; which parts suit the way he choses to live and which parts do not. The nerve on him. :lol: "i hear what you say oh lord, but i respectfully disagree"
When a god fearing man has the arrogance to decide huge chunks of gods word are "not for him" he can justify anything.
 
I think it is a shame that the thread got closed down to be honest - Robbie was actually responding to questions - and although I can not agree with anything that he does regarding Ugrades, I appreciate him standing up and giving his point of view
 
itfciain said:
I think it is a shame tnat the thread got closed down to be honest - Robbie was actaully responding to questions - and although I can not agree with anything that he does regarding Ugrades I appreciate him standing up and giving his point of view

Agreed, but his babbling and quoting the Bible only lowered my opinion of him even more so

Nice to know that he still checks out this forum too :lol:
 
Fair enough. Don't want trouble. Though the post were meant for giggles I understand that the topic is a trouble maker.

Let's mOve on.
 
itfciain said:
I think it is a shame that the thread got closed down to be honest - Robbie was actually responding to questions - and although I can not agree with anything that he does regarding Ugrades, I appreciate him standing up and giving his point of view

Agreed. But, it had run its course/gone off on a massive religious tangent.

aussiejames said:
I'm not religious & would rather not see ANY religious discussions on these boards.

Seconded, or thirded if Liam beat me to seconding it.

PGowdy said:
The most eye opening thing about that thread was learning that Robbie appears to be a religious man who picks and choses which parts of the bible are apt and valid and which parts are not. ie; which parts suit the way he choses to live and which parts do not.

I think you'll find ALL Christians do that, especially with the Old testament! (Yes, I realise the irony of that last sentence after saying I didn't like/want religious discussion on the boards, just pointing out a degree of selective implementation is common in all derivations of Christianity).
 
weasel said:
itfciain said:
I think it is a shame that the thread got closed down to be honest - Robbie was actually responding to questions - and although I can not agree with anything that he does regarding Ugrades, I appreciate him standing up and giving his point of view

Agreed. But, it had run its course/gone off on a massive religious tangent.

Yeah that thread had descended into nonsense. It should have been shut down earlier!

weasel said:
PGowdy said:
The most eye opening thing about that thread was learning that Robbie appears to be a religious man who picks and choses which parts of the bible are apt and valid and which parts are not. ie; which parts suit the way he choses to live and which parts do not.
weasel said:
I think you'll find ALL Christians do that, especially with the Old testament! (Yes, I realise the irony of that last sentence after saying I didn't like/want religious discussion on the boards, just pointing out a degree of selective implementation is common in all derivations of Christianity).

Oh, i know. and the gaul of it always makes me laugh. My comment wasn't even really about religion. Just thought that kind of deluded nonsense says a lot about this particular person that's all.
 
It was interesting when he said that he felt that the peak of UGrade s was over.

Do you think this is so?

I have zero idea.
 
I may have been a bit harsh but my post was hardly verbal abuse and I was just stating what many others were thinking. With all the posts I have seen on him recently (I count 4 this month) it doesnt seem he is very welcome. So that comment was based on facts not my personal opinion.

Someone who is part of a vintage toy collecting community and at the same time destroys the things its member spend hours collecting whilst spouting religious script has got to be kidding themselves. There was no verbal abuse - just people expressing there disdain for his practices. Is it really that surprising??

To be honest what pisses me off most are hypocrits who stick up for people like this just because they are a mate or because they sell or buy from them. I have more respect for someone who sticks by their beliefs regardless of whether they are right or wrong.

But aparently as long as you have a family to look after and support its all justifiable.

And aparently discussions like this have no place in the RS forum and are driving members away. So I should probably get more involved with arguments on image content and terms of service because thats what keeps everyone happy.
 
Yeah i've never heard a good defence from anyone who sticks up for him it's always just "i like him" or "i have dealt with him and he's nice" ... therefore all his actions are fine. :lol: **** off.
 
Yep. The ned Flanders wife 'I have a family' was great. And I enjoyed the surreal religious ending. I came from it actually liking Robbie. I think we are so far opposite we will never agree on anything I'd love to do a town hall debate with him on religion and then ugrades. I dislike him so much, I think I like him. Like batman needs joker.

I enjoyed all of it. Just wished more people took the opportunity to ask the guy some questions.
 
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Star-Wars-Vintage-AFA-U90-Graded-1984-Endor-Forest-Ranger-Mint-/300737865006?pt=UK_ToysGames_ActionFigures_ActionFigures_JN&hash=item46055fa52e

:lol: :lol: :lol:
 
Old Thread: Hello . There have been no replies in this thread for 365 days.
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant.
Perhaps it would be better to start a new thread instead.
Back
Top Bottom