tennis!!!??????

poncho

Grand Master
Joined
Sep 23, 2009
Messages
5,448
Location
North Wales
so i was bored today watched some stargate universe and then watched some of wimbledon. serena williams played and won 2 sets too 0! how come women play less sets than the men , its not really fair men have to win by 3 sets and women 2...... i mean if your 2 nil down you can still win 3-2! the womens game is far easier........
 
ponchobelt said:
so i was bored today watched some stargate universe and then watched some of wimbledon. serena williams played and won 2 sets too 0! how come women play less sets than the men , its not really fair men have to win by 3 sets and women 2...... i mean if your 2 nil down you can still win 3-2! the womens game is far easier........

Because the rules where made back in the day when women were not supposed to exert themselves and sweat (and seen as the weaker sex).

Simple as that I would guess :?:
 
i thought this was the case, what a load of bollocks! the tennis organisation should shake things up and make it 3 sets for women and make the game more exciting
 
It's not fair and it annoys the **** out of me (and a lot of professional tennis players so i hear).
Women fought for ages, outraged that they weren't getting paid as much as men so the prize money, a few years back, was made the same as the mens. BUT. That's now the same amount of money for doing a LOT less work. Women tennis players, in fact, get paid much more than men now. How's that for equality? "but tennis isn't really work" you might argue, now so. By playing those extra sets and playing, at times, 6-7 hour matches the men put sever strain on their bodies and are at far greater risk of injury which could in fact lead to them leaving a tournament early costing them 10s of thousands of £s in prize money.
"but men are stronger and fitter" i've heard people argue. Buuuuull-shiiiiiit. Have you seen those "women" christ! I certainly wouldn't fancy myself in a punch up with one of them. These women are reared like prized race-horses. They train god knows how many hours a day 7 days a week yet their tennis matches tend to last about 45 minutes to an hour.
The whole thing is absurd. This is not a sexist rant either, in fact it's nothing to do with sex at all. Women deserve as much money as men so long as they do the same amount of work. There is no good reason women don't play 5 sets. Altho i get the feeling if it was voted for most of the women would vote against it being changed. Why on earth would you want to nearly triple your work load for no more money?? Now that would be just silly.
 
I would rather the mens game was dropped to best of 3 sets rather than the womens game increased. No room for error then, a more intense game maybe and the grass on the baseline at Wimbledon might actually last until the final.

What is the set up for mixed doubles?
 
PGowdy said:
Have you seen those "women" christ! I certainly wouldn't fancy myself in a punch up with one of them. These women are reared like prized race-horses. They train god knows how many hours a day 7 days a week yet their tennis matches tend to last about 45 minutes to an hour.
The whole thing is absurd.

have you heard them grunt when they hit the ball its quite scary!!...your right they should be paid less men! men work harder and retire earlier than women also due to the workload over the years compared to the womens game
 
Found this just for you guys...

http://www.topendsports.com/sport/tennis/men-v-women.htm

Doesn't really cover the number of sets argument but still fun to read :D

Been looking into it a bit and men don't play 5 sets in all competitions, just the Grand slams maybe.
 
Yeah there are several lower level comps where the men only play best of 3. Mainly cos no one's watching i think.
 
PGowdy said:
Yeah there are several lower level comps where the men only play best of 3. Mainly cos no one's watching i think.

Come on Roger, no ones watching. Lets do best of three then get down the pub. :lol:
 
I've said it before: I love women's tennis:
maria_sharapova_close_up.jpg

arantxa-rus.jpg

kirilenko.jpg
 
PGowdy said:
It's not fair and it annoys the **** out of me (and a lot of professional tennis players so i hear).
Women fought for ages, outraged that they weren't getting paid as much as men so the prize money, a few years back, was made the same as the mens. BUT. That's now the same amount of money for doing a LOT less work. Women tennis players, in fact, get paid much more than men now. How's that for equality? "but tennis isn't really work" you might argue, now so. By playing those extra sets and playing, at times, 6-7 hour matches the men put sever strain on their bodies and are at far greater risk of injury which could in fact lead to them leaving a tournament early costing them 10s of thousands of £s in prize money.
"but men are stronger and fitter" i've heard people argue. Buuuuull-shiiiiiit. Have you seen those "women" christ! I certainly wouldn't fancy myself in a punch up with one of them. These women are reared like prized race-horses. They train god knows how many hours a day 7 days a week yet their tennis matches tend to last about 45 minutes to an hour.
The whole thing is absurd. This is not a sexist rant either, in fact it's nothing to do with sex at all. Women deserve as much money as men so long as they do the same amount of work. There is no good reason women don't play 5 sets. Altho i get the feeling if it was voted for most of the women would vote against it being changed. Why on earth would you want to nearly triple your work load for no more money?? Now that would be just silly.

Summed it up pretty well!
 
Old Thread: Hello . There have been no replies in this thread for 365 days.
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant.
Perhaps it would be better to start a new thread instead.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom