Bramistuta25
Sith Lord
Just a theory, but this could be THE most calculated revenge scenario in history. What if Toni beat JJ to the MOCs and he's never forgiven him?
:shock: :?
:shock: :?
Bramistuta25 said:Just a theory, but this could be THE most calculated revenge scenario in history. What if Toni beat JJ to the MOCs and he's never forgiven him?
:shock: :?
tiefighterboy said:Bramistuta25 said:Just a theory, but this could be THE most calculated revenge scenario in history. What if Toni beat JJ to the MOCs and he's never forgiven him?
:shock: :?
What if Joiner manufactured these to bring with him. No way some of these would pass AFA, UKG or Stevie wonder. The ultimate lie.
Bramistuta25 said:True, but I don't think you can question AFA and UKG to a degree as this was the accepted seal for these MOCs. Don't forget how long this is going back.
x-pack said:These are a few I took at Fordingbridge. The others on the previous page are better.
Grant got me to take these. The first one is obviously a loose bubble from one of these cards. The others two are dodgy melted seals.
![]()
This photo shows something I noticed.
If you look at the glue marks they meet and make a right-angle a couple of mm away from the inside edge.
This is the same on my Bossk & TFP but not the Luke where the seal curves round with the bubble.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
This can also been seen on the upside down HT purchased from JJ.
![]()
Is this right angle common?
Cheers,
Vernon said:x-pack said:These are a few I took at Fordingbridge. The others on the previous page are better.
Grant got me to take these. The first one is obviously a loose bubble from one of these cards. The others two are dodgy melted seals.
![]()
This photo shows something I noticed.
If you look at the glue marks they meet and make a right-angle a couple of mm away from the inside edge.
This is the same on my Bossk & TFP but not the Luke where the seal curves round with the bubble.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
This can also been seen on the upside down HT purchased from JJ.
![]()
Is this right angle common?
Cheers,
mr_palitoy said:Guys, while you're all debunking the cards JJ bought along that are obvious reseals, hardly anyone is mentioning Marttias and the latest solid proof that Toni's mocs are made from unused cardbacks. The pink dot that shows the unused cardback and minty mint MOCs came from the same stock. Have checked all 4 of my used cardbacks for 65d c3p0 removeable limbs and there is no pink dot present on any of them. And there is a pink dot on the one in my AFA 90 MOC run...
Discuss!
![]()
Jason
Vernon said:x-pack said:These are a few I took at Fordingbridge. The others on the previous page are better.
Grant got me to take these. The first one is obviously a loose bubble from one of these cards. The others two are dodgy melted seals.
![]()
This photo shows something I noticed.
If you look at the glue marks they meet and make a right-angle a couple of mm away from the inside edge.
This is the same on my Bossk & TFP but not the Luke where the seal curves round with the bubble.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
This can also been seen on the upside down HT purchased from JJ.
![]()
Is this right angle common?
Cheers,
bobbybobs said:Someone please correct me if I'm wrong but if Toni's seals passed AFA/UKG scrutiny then doesn't it mean that other reseals may also have been undetected? I mean all they would need is an original card, bubble, figure and then use a similar heat resealing method to Toni.
Sorry if this has been discussed already.
JuniorChubb said:bobbybobs said:Someone please correct me if I'm wrong but if Toni's seals passed AFA/UKG scrutiny then doesn't it mean that other reseals may also have been undetected? I mean all they would need is an original card, bubble, figure and then use a similar heat resealing method to Toni.
Sorry if this has been discussed already.
Before this 'reseal' meant taking an opened card and resealing it to its original bubble, or maybe a replacement bubble, an easy to spot operation for the layman, let alone the graders.
Now its a little bit different as the cardbacks and bubbles are previously unused, making detection more difficult when done correctly. I would guess you are right though, if the ingredients have been available, others may have pulled the same trick.
I think the term 'reseal' can confuse the issue, these had never been sealed in the first place.