Help Needed - Jawa Blaster REPRO or Original?

I was going to say no mine is black-black. But the groove in the barrel up the top is the "seam" and because it is so thin there is a blue tinge. But no where else.
 
Sorry Jay, only just read the thread.

I'll have a look at my carded to see what blasters I have.

Stu
 
Pretty sure the one I just took a picture of that I determined to be a repro is exactly like this..

Right, off to edit some pictures!
 
Is this the same one ?
If so I weeded it out for being a repro but it doesn't "sound" like a repro when dropped
 
Thats the one Joe


I have covered loads of Jawa Blaster Variants over the last month for the website
and none of them have the line thats runs to the end let alone curves upwards and
none of them have that type of handle grip.

So far approx 100 Jawa MOC's (nearly all card issues) have been checked (thanks
to everyone who i hounded to do this) and this Jawa Blaster hasn't been confirmed.

Anybody on here who hasn't checked their Jawa MOC's and can find
3 minutes to do so it would be greatly appreciated.

Its also turned up in a REPRO bundle as well. (sold as REPRO) and a REPRO ebay
dealer confirmed having these in stock as REPRO's a few years back.

Its been a real time consuming investigation so far and all the indicators are
that it is indeed REPRO i just dont want to label something as REPRO unless 99.9%
positive.

What do you guys think?

Jay
 
I would say it is a repro, I didn't realise mine was the same as the one in this thread but I had labelled it repro when I checked
my weapons last month so for me it still is.
 
Going on the info you've gathered so far Jay i'd have to say....

Repro until proved innocent!! :lol:

It just doesn't look right to me.
 
Just checked all my carded and loose and I do not have that weapon.

It's the curving upward part at the back of the barrell that is missing
from all of mine.
 
Old Thread: Hello . There have been no replies in this thread for 365 days.
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant.
Perhaps it would be better to start a new thread instead.
Back
Top Bottom