As discussed, here is a comparison shot with the 3 figures. It would appear that the Macau COO figure has the same paint spray application as the Hong Kong figure. Yellow paint and then sprayed Green eyes. It is quite noticeable on the H.K COO variant that the yellow paint was applied and the eyes unpainted. Just wondering if anyone has come across this?
Picked up three of these variants. A number of slight differences between the figures including paint application and markings. (Discussed further below)
All three have the same LFL markings on the right leg.
The two light armour figures have slightly different No COO legs. One has a smooth surface with little dots, while the other has a raised scarring on the leg. There again appears to be 4 small dots on this scarring, not sure if this is a COO that has been removed? Any advice on this would be great
Figure with 'smooth' COO left leg:
Second figure with Scarred COO left leg:
The 4 dots mentioned are clearly visible in this shot:
Currently have two Macau COO figures. Both are very similar, armour colour etc. The couple of small differences between the two are in the leg markings, Discussed below.
Here's a side by side shot:
As stated, the Macau COO on the legs are quite different. You can see the one on the right is almost missing the 'M'. The figure on the left has an almost 'melted' look to the area surrounding the COO, which has much greater definition...
The LFL markings are slightly different aswell. One has straight stamp while the other, shown below on the left, has the second 'L' at an angle...
Here's another shot that shows the raised 'scarring' on the left leg of one of the No COO figures, discussed above. Can be seen a bit better...Apologies for the slight blurring...