weasel said:
Cheers for the heads up Bill. I hope no one on here would be taken in by that, but then you never know!
No problem guys. Like I said, I'm pretty thick skinned, and it takes a lot to get me riled up over something, but this guy has certainly
done it. Aside from changing his stories numerous times, he went as far as to call me out IN the first auction listing. He pointed out
information my site, then turned around and says he "has only seen one other Gold Case on the web, period". So I can only assume
he doesn't have the power of sight being that I have the actual pics of the item I'm describing in my listings.
The problem with these cases very much parallel the debates over vintage repro pieces. These were made *as* reproductions by a
dealer who advertised in "Toy Shop", and were sold as such. (Around $150usd at the time). The issue is now, and has been when
these cases have filtered down over the years, and people either knowingly try to pass them off as real, or an unsuspecting collector
has purchased one, and doesn't know the difference. (This guy is the former) The cases look good at first glance, so I felt there was
real potential for someone to get taken by this.
The only thing I can really give him credit for this time around is at least he is upfront about not knowing if the case is authentic.
Bill