Anybody successful at Vectis today ?

I got the Toltoys Vader - £12500, the miss card OB1 on a Jawa card for £6000 and the Leia Organa on a Jedi card for £3000. Went over my £20k budget!!! lol

I did actually get a couple of MOC I've been after for a while, very happy. 41 back Dengar and 45 back CCP.
 
I was the underbidder on the POTF Han in Carbonite. Some steep prices for certain items I thought, whilst others were pretty much as you'd expect.
 
There was a toltoys open 21 back tuscan that went cheap but there wasn't much in the way of good value (for a tight fecker)
 
No…out bid on the three Tri Logo's that I bid on.
They sold for the price I expected but once commission was added they were out of where I wanted them to be (or a tight fecker as @lejackal would put it.😏)
I wondered why the GG went for so much, thanks for clearing that up.
And lets hope that our dear forum friend did well out of it 🤞
 
No…out bid on the three Tri Logo's that I bid on.
They sold for the price I expected but once commission was added they were out of where I wanted them to be (or a tight fecker as @lejackal would put it.😏)
I wondered why the GG went for so much, thanks for clearing that up.
And lets hope that our dear forum friend did well out of it 🤞
Yes that was always at the back of my mind.
 
I always had a niggling doubt that my 2 were TT, but the 1 is an AFA 85 on a 65A card, and the other ungraded looks exactly the same, I really need to check again with an Echo guide.
(That was the first thing I discovered when joining this forum , TT gate 😲 )
 
Nothing for me..had bids on the Toltoys 12 backs but ended up way out of my league. The hunt continues!
 
I vaguely remember reading that the TT GGs (excuse me...) were on Palitoy 65Cs only. Could be wrong but that rings a bell.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20211008-222923_Samsung Internet.jpg
    Screenshot_20211008-222923_Samsung Internet.jpg
    102.1 KB · Views: 94
Old Thread: Hello . There have been no replies in this thread for 365 days.
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant.
Perhaps it would be better to start a new thread instead.
Back
Top Bottom