Today on Facebook...

Out of interest Paul, Adam and Dan........who owns "your" group?
Who maintains it?
Who decides on the format?
And who can change or take it away at any given point, with no notice leaving you with sweet FA?

Facebook, that's who.

Who owns, maintains and pays for this forum?
Who listens to it's members even when he may not agree with them?

Edd, that's who.

Remind us all again oh mighty and revered Admin of Echo what exactly you've got?
 
Mr-shifter said:
You won't even let other people mention other groups or sites on echo. If that isn't elitism I don't know what is.

I've never understood this stance, surely if helping collectors and educating them is a driving force behind Echo like you say, then pointing them in the direction of other sites with more of a focus can be of great benefit.

If another group approaches you for permission to post a link to their site and they do likewise, I don't see the harm in it at all.
 
RetroDan16 said:
All I stated was that forum use has seen a steady decline over the last few years and will continue to do so. That's not sniping at this forum, it's just how the internet is evolving. I would imagine Reddit will replace forums before Facebook does.

Yes, and that's the statement I completely blew out the water with stats. You are simply wrong, end of discussion. Numbers do matter when you say something that is bollocks and numbers can prove it.

Glad to see somebody has finally come up with a basic stat plugin For Facebook. That brings the platform right up to 2005. By the way, interesting stat on active members. Might want to correct that misleading "10,000 members" claim.
 
Lom said:
RetroDan16 said:
Wow. Continue to condescend all you like, however I won't retaliate. Here's some stats 'that I don't have'. These are from the last 30 days.
RetroDan16 said:
Your signature and its usage sums up the attitude of this thread perfectly. Mocking. Belittling. Elitism.
RetroDan16 said:
I'm not going to bang on that forums are dating badly, but I noticed there was an option to add my ICQ handle in the profile...
An attempt to condescend, mock and belittle whilst coming across as elitist in that final quote - care to add hypocrisy to your growing list of traits?

Agreed, the irony of calling me condescending and elitist :lol:
 
RetroDan16 said:
I'm not going to bang on that forums are dating badly, but I noticed there was an option to add my ICQ handle in the profile...

Facebook asks for your phone number. Now that's cutting edge! Please tell us more about how you maintain and update the software on "your" website, you seem very happy to take the credit for it.
 
lejackal said:
Out of interest Paul, Adam and Dan........who owns "your" group?
Who maintains it?
Who decides on the format?
And who can change or take it away at any given point, with no notice leaving you with sweet FA?

Facebook, that's who.

Who owns, maintains and pays for this forum?
Who listens to it's members even when he may not agree with them?

Edd, that's who.

Remind us all again oh mighty and revered Admin of Echo what exactly you've got?

Now carl raises a really important point here. Facebook as a selling platform has only really happened over the past couple of years. Now since then Facebook has developed the Facebook sales component, as well as a payment system. Having spent all this time and effort developing this, do you think it is going to let you have it for free?

So far all of its money is generated through targeted advertising. How long do you think they are going to let £1000000s of pounds of sales take place on their site without wanting a small slice of the action? And when that does happen none of your sales rules will apply. It will be facebooks rules and facebooks format and if you don't like it they will close you down.

So when this day comes, you are going to be nothing more than eBay. 10000 members suddenly pales into insignificance when you look at eBay's selling base.
 
Yep, Facebook's days in its current format are numbered. MySpace was the most valuable website in the world once, now it doesn't exist. Contrary to Dan's arrogant claim this website will still be here long after the Facebook groups are all gone, purely because I have control over that and they don't.
 
RetroDan16 said:
Your signature and its usage sums up the attitude of this thread perfectly. Mocking. Belittling. Elitism.

Actually it is your group that is solely responsible for these ill-informed people. Because you selfishly go to such great lengths to stop your members finding out about eBay, other groups and other forums, they have no clue about the wider world of collecting beyond basic loose figures. So rather than criticise the people pointing out your members short comings, why don't you do something about it? Ego and greed, that's why.
 
By the way, has anybody else noticed that despite the fact Jason's group has almost double the amount of members of Echo Base, it rarely if ever gets mentioned in this Facebook thread? I wonder why that is.
 
SublevelStudios said:
Mr-shifter said:
You won't even let other people mention other groups or sites on echo. If that isn't elitism I don't know what is.

I've never understood this stance, surely if helping collectors and educating them is a driving force behind Echo like you say, then pointing them in the direction of other sites with more of a focus can be of great benefit.

If another group approaches you for permission to post a link to their site and they do likewise, I don't see the harm in it at all.
I always thought the same. It should go both ways and rules should apply for all, including admins
Only a week ago one of the admins was promoting EB Australia on another aussie page, his first and only post so that should mean others could post on Echo or does it only work when it suits?
Same as the 'no pm dealing' rule but that's for another time :lol:
 
Stats.. God love 'em… The one that stands out to me (and I've used Echo to sell recently and donated to their charity as part of that sale, so have no issue with that group), is that the stats given show in the last 30 days there have been 4506 'active members', one would assume that that to be active they must make a post or click like on a feed/thread, not just be someone that has liked the actual page… interaction with it would make you active. Fair assumption?

I can also see that there have been in the past 30 days 4196 posts, so actual contributory text to aid discussion, sales or purchases ("claim" / "PM sent")
This can only lead to one conclusion, if active members post (4506 of them) and there are only 4196 posts… either posts are being regularly deleted and not recorded or at best each active member is posting once at best each and a handful (c400 others) are interacting with those posts, not really a community.

Either way, the 10,064 people on Echo rhetoric, is utter nonsense, yes, 10,064 people like the page... but the stats show 4506 at the most, given that a 30 day period is a fair view of activity. From what I can see on Edd's stats, the Forum is growing, the members page shows over 4700 registered users; there are a chunk of zero post members (c1500) but, the majority of the zero posters are brand new.
So on the forum there's an active posting base of 68% of its membership
On Echo Base an active posting base of 55% of its membership

So, one has more members, but both has a very similar active membership that actually post and contribute

Jeez, I have 5268 followers on my (predominantly Star Wars driven) Instagram feed, do I know them, no, maybe a dozen of them… am I famous or important because of it, Insta-famous maybe! :lol: :lol: :lol: I certainly wouldn't be quoting it at the start of any discussion as to why my Instagram is better than yours..

What the actual contribution is on each of the two platforms is not something that the stats clearly reveal, however 9 words per post average is a slightly damming stat in that this thread alone doesn't have many posts on it less than 9 words and a statistical view as this would rocket that average up (404 so far BTW) simply by its inclusion. I would personally not write something like this on any Facebook group as it would simply be a waste of me typing it, no one would see it after a few moments and it would be subsumed into the sales on most of them.

It does suggest that if an opening sales post is say 100 words and 4 people write "claim" and 3 put "PM sent" , of course four more write someone's name and a couple of "bump" in response that gets you an average of nine words per post… It's a selling site, it's what you would expect.

Now, if that is what they advertise themselves as a sales site (I like the car boot sale comment personally as it reflects the general trading style on most Facebook groups) which is what they are and not a community which they all seem to think they are, but, what they are not; no stats required to explain that difference, just use your eyes and look at pretty much any Facebook group, then I do think a lot of the tension would dissipate. It up to folk to educate themselves about what they are buying and what it is worth, not the Admins and equally its fair game to laugh at and mock some of the beyond stupid things written on any Facebook group or forum, be that "what's this worth" 2 minutes after someone else posted the same (probably worthless) item, "mail call" which I will never understand on a selling page or "great price" at something they have no idea what it is or what the price should be…

The best thing to do is keep this place growing and full of knowledge and the more interested parties that take the hobby seriously will dip in and out here and learn to appreciate it, the rest will just do their thing no matter how upset we get.
 
Hooch said:
Only a week ago one of the admins was promoting EB Australia on another aussie page, his first and only post so that should mean others could post on Echo or does it only work when it suits?

Yep funny that, because Echo admin Paul Desykes or "Leahs Toys" as he's been known on here for 9 years has no problem spamming other forums and websites with his eBay sales:

leahs-toys.png


From his last few posts in this thread you would think he had just popped his head in to see what the fuss was about. For somebody who hates this forum so much he sure used to spend a lot of time here before he invented Facebook.
 
RetroDan16 said:
xbomber said:
I think it's all been said. I use both forums and Facebook groups as they serve two different purposes.

There are cringe-making David Bent-style antics on Echo (see my signature for a recent example) and a bit too much backslapping for my taste ("Hey everyone, I sent Bob this figure for free because that's the Echo way")... BUT it's great for buying and selling and introducing people to this fine passtime.

Hopefully the prices they're stoking will settle down a little soon.

Your signature and its usage sums up the attitude of this thread perfectly. Mocking. Belittling. Elitism.

Thanks for your opinion. Mine is that you need to be less precious.

I'd have enjoyed and appropriated the quote regardless of whether it was sourced from Echo, here or indeed some bloke down the pub . The joy in the quote is the magical "massive twat factor" not a hidden intention to belittle. Especially when (as you may have noted from the same post) I'm one of the posters here who has time for Echo.
 
Ok, I went to bed earlier thinking that might be the end of it; I'd given you some pointless stats that you didn't think I could get, I have constantly stated I'm not speaking for Echo but the attitudes towards Facebook as a whole and still it just becomes a thread criticising the group, the people you don't like within it and it's practices.
It's clear that's all this'll ever be about and that's fine; however I'm not going to keep going in circles when it ends up with the same track of Echo.
When even a jokey comment about ICQ gets taken way too seriously, I know I'm wasting both mine and your time because it's clear we'll never agree here. I guess only time will tell on that score. I wish you the best with your chosen platform. I'm sure you'll still be here long after I'm done with Facebook and groups and pie charts. Oh, and the beloved Echo.
I was hoping something productive or positive might come of this thread, sadly not though.
 
Nice try Dan, you're the only person who's been consistently arrogant, condescending and plain wrong in this thread (OK I was wrong about the stats.) The fact you stayed up til nearly 2 in the morning trying to prove your point shows you do care about it. Don't have the balls to apologise for being wrong though I see.
 
edd_jedi said:
Nice try Dan, you're the only person who's been consistently arrogant, condescending and plain wrong in this thread (OK I was wrong about the stats.) The fact you stayed up til nearly 2 in the morning trying to prove your point shows you do care about it. Don't have the balls to apologise for being wrong though I see.

Not once have I spoken condescendingly Edd, nor did I stay up until 2am collating pointless figures for you.
Happy to apologise for anything that might have come across wrongly (internet/context) or anything that you might think is wrong.
I'm not 'trying' anything.
 
Mr-shifter said:
Dan,

Could you answer my point about the toy Toni scandal, and how, if as you suggest, facebooks take over from forums, how something like that could ever happen again but on Facebook?

What I mean is a community driven investigation into one of the biggest issues to come to the fore of collecting in recent years, that resulted in exposure on national television. Tell me how that could happen using an average of nine words per post?

Dan,

Your thoughts on this question. You keep avoiding it and picking the pieces out you want. It's not an echo centric question, it's about the Facebook platform in general.
 
None of them have answered any of these questions because they know the answer is "Facebook can't do that." And that alone shows their arrogance without even saying anything, refusing to admit there is value beyond their little group.
 
I'll talk about Facebook as a hole, it's a stat accumulating social networking sight which sole purpose is to gat masses amount of personal information so that information can be sold to marketing companies. This information is then used to spam your account trying to sell you stuff.

I use Facebook to stay in contact with old friends which is what it was originally designed for.

Then it was sold.

That's why I like this thread. :)
 
Mr-shifter said:
Mr-shifter said:
Dan,

Could you answer my point about the toy Toni scandal, and how, if as you suggest, facebooks take over from forums, how something like that could ever happen again but on Facebook?

What I mean is a community driven investigation into one of the biggest issues to come to the fore of collecting in recent years, that resulted in exposure on national television. Tell me how that could happen using an average of nine words per post?

Dan,

Your thoughts on this question. You keep avoiding it and picking the pieces out you want. It's not an echo centric question, it's about the Facebook platform in general.
Apologies on missing this, when did the scandal break exactly?
Before the boom in Facebook groups as in when forums were more frequently used?
 
Old Thread: Hello . There have been no replies in this thread for 365 days.
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant.
Perhaps it would be better to start a new thread instead.
Back
Top Bottom