jabbawokkie
Grand Master
on rs ,where it says number of replys why is there a number in red .is this saying ther is swearing
han duo said:Darth Wensleydale said:There certain people on RS who just prowl the 'watch out' section causing trouble. KJ81 being one of them. They never post anything positive anywhere else :roll:
I think with listings like Han's you have to just do enough so you can't be accused of being shady. Its a fine line to walk and some of Han's listings are on the right side and some are a bit too vague. As long as people know the basics i.e. reseal or not then theres nothing wrong with letting them ask the questions and view the photos.
i agree with you to a certain extent....however.....let me ask you this ...
in my droid collection auction it clearly states that the cardbacks have been repaired and that they are reseals....ive just had someone offer me to end the auction and they would pay me £100 for each figure.......what would you do ??? :roll:
ive not answered there email yet.......
dell30 said::?
I agree that the listings state reseals, but why not just list them in the resealed section ( :idea: ) and have the description simply " item as pictured "
completely removes any ambiguity :?:
han duo said:dell30 said::?
I agree that the listings state reseals, but why not just list them in the resealed section ( :idea: ) and have the description simply " item as pictured "
completely removes any ambiguity :?:
in my defence ..untill today i didnt relise that the resealed section existed...ive just listed a load more ...all in that section
Darth Wensleydale said:I think it would be easy enough to miss if Han was using a template he's used for MOC figs for speed. I only noticed it relatively recently and I've been selling for years![]()
dell30 said:han duo said:dell30 said::?
I agree that the listings state reseals, but why not just list them in the resealed section ( :idea: ) and have the description simply " item as pictured "
completely removes any ambiguity :?:
in my defence ..untill today i didnt relise that the resealed section existed...ive just listed a load more ...all in that section
918 rating on ebay and you've never noticed these under vintage :!:
Sorry, but that is hard to believe
Vintage (1977-89) :
Collections/ Bulk Lots
Figures (Loose)
Figures (Original Carded)
Figures (Resealed Carded)
Vehicles/ Playsets
Weapons & Spare Parts
Other Vintage Star Wars
mr_palitoy said:Good to see you are making good on these listings.
The one I pointed out to you is still in the wrong section, and makes no mention of it being a reseal anywhere in the listing, small print or otherwise:-
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=310066107518
Jason
han duo said:mr_palitoy said:Good to see you are making good on these listings.
The one I pointed out to you is still in the wrong section, and makes no mention of it being a reseal anywhere in the listing, small print or otherwise:-
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=310066107518
Jason
IT DOES ACTUALLY JASON...CHECK THE EBAY SPEC.. IT SAYS ORIGINAL PACKAGING OPENED !!!! HOWEVER......IVE ADDED MORE, IS THAT OK?
dell30 said:completely removes any ambiguity :?:
jabbawokkie said:i listed a reseal in vintage clearly as a reseal before,( you start crying ).because i listed it in reseal section and no one bothered ,ended up with 5 watching in vintage and winning bidder was a newbie but i exchanged about 5 emails telling him what it was and even told him to join this site.
if you think i,m a wrong for this ,TOUGH .there is far worst **** happening in world so why dont you get from behind you ****ing little monitors and do something about them.........because you are to scared .
about time we left this crying to rs as its gettig ****ing boring
dell30 said:so why don't you set up your own forum where you can bully and swear at people :?:
dell30 said:a reseal should go in the resealed section, period. What is so diffilcult about that ? It attracts less attention ? Oh, what a shame, lets put it in a popular section and try and mislead people with a bit of vagueness