SublevelStudios said:Dannywhiteley said:Just one really strong piece of evidence like those posted above, with the promise of much more to follow would've prevented much of the first 25 pages. Something to back up the original allegation alongside the photos of the rogue baggies. Puts a whole different light on it.
Exactly.
theforceuk said:SublevelStudios said:Dannywhiteley said:Just one really strong piece of evidence like those posted above, with the promise of much more to follow would've prevented much of the first 25 pages. Something to back up the original allegation alongside the photos of the rogue baggies. Puts a whole different light on it.
Exactly.
I completely disagree, what you should have done is shut up and waited.
It's not Franks fault you have trouble processing written information.
Chill out fgs jesustheforceuk said:I completely agree, but enough is enough. How can anyone still come back to the OP having a go at Frank because he should have done this or he should have done that. Oh I would have done this. I tell you something, if it wasn't for Frank most of you would still be buying fake baggies so stop having a go at him and show some respect.
You need to have a word with yourselves.
Lindo said:Chill out fgs jesustheforceuk said:I completely agree, but enough is enough. How can anyone still come back to the OP having a go at Frank because he should have done this or he should have done that. Oh I would have done this. I tell you something, if it wasn't for Frank most of you would still be buying fake baggies so stop having a go at him and show some respect.
You need to have a word with yourselves.
Frunkstar said:Whats already been posted BTW is still only the tip of the iceberg, so where are all those naysayers & ****-slingers now?? - thanks for all the apologies BTW - figures
Patience is a virtue you know!!! - I did say more info was forthcoming not that anyone took note of it & waited before lighting the fireworks, I hope you are all really proud of yourselves.
Frunkstar said:Please can we ALL set aside any petty squabbling & try to concentrate on the matter at hand, which is making the hobby a safe & enjoyable one for us all by removing fakes from it.
Whats already been posted BTW is still only the tip of the iceberg, so where are all those naysayers & ****-slingers now?? - thanks for all the apologies BTW - figures
maxf said:Frank - Thanks for all of your hard work. I was initially a little critical as the evidence didnt seem to be totally there - I'm fully behind you now.
maxf said:As I see it:
Best case - Jeff is a shady seller.
Mid case - Jeff is knowingly selling fake baggies, possibly linked to the person/persons making them.
Worst case - Jeff is making them.
Frunkstar said:Not you at all Max I thought your posts were well thought out & you made some valid points, I think the biggest headache has been Joe (finestcomics) as we all know (sorry Edd), the argumentative confrontational nature of that particular members posts made getting on with this more promptly like wading through waist high treacle for a while.
maxf said:Frank - Thanks for all of your hard work. I was initially a little critical as the evidence didnt seem to be totally there - I'm fully behind you now.
As I see it:
Best case - Jeff is a shady seller.
Mid case - Jeff is knowingly selling fake baggies, possibly linked to the person/persons making them.
Worst case - Jeff is making them.
Ross_Barr said:FFS people, it is clear these all came from Jeff (and perhaps it is now clear that he knew some were fake because Frank told him and then maybe still sold those same ones on), so that leads logically to only the following conclusions: (1) Jeff was making these in his basement in true Toy Toni fashion; (2) Jeff was so grossly irresponsible in not knowing that he was buying dozens and dozens of fake baggies and then selling on to others, but didn't actually make the baggies himself; or (3) Jeff reprehensibly knew he had tons of fake baggies that were bought elsewhere (i.e., he didn't make them himself) once he was told so, but sold them on to others anyway.
In any of (1) - (3), the dude should have been called out and this issue brought to light not only so people would know that these are out there, but also to avoid buying any more from Jeff.
finestcomics said:Frunkstar said:Not you at all Max I thought your posts were well thought out & you made some valid points, I think the biggest headache has been Joe (finestcomics) as we all know (sorry Edd), the argumentative confrontational nature of that particular members posts made getting on with this more promptly like wading through waist high treacle for a while.
I had left this thread for dead for reasons the site admin crossed the line in addressing my participation and involvement, but since you keep bringing me up repeatedly...
I only insisted on a revising the first post since two members of the investigation stated it was not going to be proven that Jeff made them. I wasn't the only person to remark in this thread that there was still a mention in the OP inferring he did. I asked three times for that revision, and even had to supply a screengrab because apparently it wasn't something anyone remembered you writing.
The request for clarification on the Fett baggie was because discussion began to emerge about culling these, and possibly destroying them or taking them out of circulation. As the original post made no specific mention if the touch-ups were the extent, I asked if the seals were factory originals. It was also suggested in the pdocast Jeff was going to send these off to UKG - my thought here was if Stephen Ward could confirm the seals were legit, I could offer to assess if a safe removal of the touch-ups was possible. In doing so, these would not be "fake" any longer. Again, this only made sense if the seals were correct - I wasn't asking for that to be answered on the spot if the person responding was unsure, but did ask for clarification for a reason.
If asking these things in an attempt to save something vintage from being destroyed, and trying to find a positive in this sordid situation makes me a troll, so be it.
But that was my intent. What you call argumentative overlooks the fact I was asking for clarification. I ask you to refrain from painting a picture here of something that isn't - repeating falsehoods doesn't make it any more true.
I'm done here.
edd_jedi said:I think the big point you were missing Joe is that this was not a touch up. A touch up is restoring something that was there before, eg colouring a tear in a cardback black again. The Kenner text on the Fett baggie was painted white to make it look like an ESB-B bag - it had no white on it before. That is not a touch up, it's trying to change the appearance/type of the bag. As many others seemed to agree, that falls under the umbrella of fake, not simply restoration.
Apologies for calling you a troll but at the time our energy could have been spent better elsewhere than arguing over the definition of fake.
darth_daddius said:finestcomics said:Frunkstar said:Not you at all Max I thought your posts were well thought out & you made some valid points, I think the biggest headache has been Joe (finestcomics) as we all know (sorry Edd), the argumentative confrontational nature of that particular members posts made getting on with this more promptly like wading through waist high treacle for a while.
I had left this thread for dead for reasons the site admin crossed the line in addressing my participation and involvement, but since you keep bringing me up repeatedly...
I only insisted on a revising the first post since two members of the investigation stated it was not going to be proven that Jeff made them. I wasn't the only person to remark in this thread that there was still a mention in the OP inferring he did. I asked three times for that revision, and even had to supply a screengrab because apparently it wasn't something anyone remembered you writing.
The request for clarification on the Fett baggie was because discussion began to emerge about culling these, and possibly destroying them or taking them out of circulation. As the original post made no specific mention if the touch-ups were the extent, I asked if the seals were factory originals. It was also suggested in the pdocast Jeff was going to send these off to UKG - my thought here was if Stephen Ward could confirm the seals were legit, I could offer to assess if a safe removal of the touch-ups was possible. In doing so, these would not be "fake" any longer. Again, this only made sense if the seals were correct - I wasn't asking for that to be answered on the spot if the person responding was unsure, but did ask for clarification for a reason.
If asking these things in an attempt to save something vintage from being destroyed, and trying to find a positive in this sordid situation makes me a troll, so be it.
But that was my intent. What you call argumentative overlooks the fact I was asking for clarification. I ask you to refrain from painting a picture here of something that isn't - repeating falsehoods doesn't make it any more true.
I'm done here.
I usually don't get into this stuff, but I'm afraid this has pushed me and I just don't buy it Joe. You were pretty happy to (very rightly) call out Adolfo and be cranky at people defending him on RS: http://forum.rebelscum.com/showthread.php?t=1118796
However, when Frank - a very respected member of this forum - mans up to call Jeff out you were pretty scathing and unsupportive. On any other day, this would have been a 'Watch Out' post within which we always beg for names, etc. With the scale of the potential deception I think Frank, Edd and the guys did a stellar job. And, as it turns out, they were right on the money.
You were being pedantic. Regardless of whether he was manufacturing them or not, he was still knowingly selling fakes. The fact is, you got a bee in your bonnet (as you did with the Adolfo thread) and leapt in with all guns blazing. You may be done Joe, but the right thing to do is learn from it and say 'Oops - sorry'.
80s_collector said:P.S Always stick to buying Vintage Star Wars carded figures from very reputable long term dealers and you wont go far wrong...![]()
tiefighterboy said:So all baggies are fake unless they surfaced during the pre internet toyshop magazine days??? Not sure about that. Was collecting back in those days and while baggies were cheap so was a bunch of other things. Hell so much stuff surfaces daily that was unknown about back then it is mind boggling. I would not go so far as to say what we knew of back then is it and everything else is recently manufactured..even baggies.