C10 does not exist

sith-smith said:
Mr-shifter said:
The words mint, good, C10, C7 are all objective.

I'd agree though would argue that they are subjective. C10 to one person may only be C9
to another. Essentially it's all subject to the individual's understanding of what C10 is as there is no absolute, objective understanding of it. It's conceivable that one could be established but whether everyone would accept it, is something else entirely!

Just like the word 'rare' which is my personal pet peeve, these words are often used to.justify or encourage a high price.

Now we go deep Gary, because rare can be very relative. A vinyl caped jawa is a rare figure when compared to say a cloth caped jawa, however when compared to say a DT vader it is positively abundant.

However if I say a vcj is rare then I will get shot down in flames as most people don't percieve them as rare. There are less of them out there than 99% of the other figures (not including the funky foreign moulded brown legs little eyes looking 2 degrees further to the left made in factory b2 uzbekistani klattu variants).

But they number thousands. So they are not rare.

It is all "from a certain point of view" as obi one might say.

All these terms mean different things to different people.
 
Totally

People will often call a figure rare...but what they really mean is that it rarely comes up for public sale. There could be dozens of them, just no one wants to sell. Or its really about how many are 'known' to exist, which can be very different to the actual number

Again you could conceivably have an objective understanding of that word and when to use it, such as less than 15 known is rare etc. Though again, can't see people agreeing.

Rarer, is a much easier term
 
Mr-shifter said:
Now we go deep Gary, because rare can be very relative. A vinyl caped jawa is a rare figure when compared to say a cloth caped jawa, however when compared to say a DT vader it is positively abundant.

However if I say a vcj is rare then I will get shot down in flames as most people don't percieve them as rare.

Then the word rare should be followed by "compared to..." Because a CVJ is NOT rare. Not in any way. We all know that. Same as a Yak Face is not rare. Saying 'but it is compared to...' does't make it rare. You could say 'oh, beaches are rare... compared to grains of sand', 'cows are rare... compared to blades off grass'. See, it really doesn't make any sense to something is rare because there are more of something else. To call something "rare" it needs to be genuinely scares and difficult to find or at least, if it is easy to find, that's just because you know there whereabouts of the one or two that exist.
 
maxf said:
I know C10 doesn't exist for 95% of figures.

C10 = Absolute, mint, perfection.

So if C10 existed for 5% of figures then there would be thousands, of UKG/AFA 95 or 100's and there aren't. Whatever is said about the graders, they see more figures than anyone else, so they should be able to spot something approaching C10.

So you're hunting for something less than C10 before you even start :D

But there's nothing wrong with wanting nice stuff.
 
maxf said:
I'd better weigh in here, as this thread is about me. Iain was kind enough to send me some photos of some figures I wanted to buy.

To be honest this wasn't just about you, although you were the proverbial 'straw that broke the camels back' - if anything with our interactions it was the length of time you took to reply that annoyed me more.

I have no problems taking extra pictures and I would much rather people see the figures in as much detail before they buy them - that way they are not disappointed and I get 29 pages of positive feedback

However, you are not alone in the quest for C10 figures and even your '95%' to me is rubbish. There are certain figures that I don't believe ever left the factory in C10 condition ...ever.

Anyways, my point is made and people like yourself can collect whatever the damn hell you want and I will leave you to it :D
 
My advice to anybody wanting the first 12 in as close to perfect condition as possible is to buy the 1995 Kenner Classic 4 pack:

CLASSIC_EDITION_4PACK.jpg


You will not find an authentic vintage figure with paint as good as these, I guarantee it. I just checked my own carded Han and Iain's is better, in fact it has the same dot on the neck so looks like it's a production issue.
 
Oh and Iain, let me know next time you have some C10 trilogos in stock ;)
 
edd_jedi said:
Oh and Iain, let me know next time you have some C10 trilogos in stock ;)

:lol: - Now there is a rarity (don't expect a PM anytime soon!)
 
jedisearcher said:
It does make me laugh when I see people arguing why figures on MOCs' or taken straight off cards don't automatically get a c10-type grade. We've all seen the video, but I guess a lot of people haven't and they obviously expect the production process to be some hermetically sealed, closed system were inperfections can't happen, when the reality is very different.

I'm one of those people - it's not because I think unopened figures are perfect. I don't think the figure itself on a MOC should be graded because by definition the C and AFA scales refer to condition from new. And an unopened figure is new, therefore automatically scoring 100%. That's different from saying it is perfect, and simply identifies a flaw in the grading system.
 
To clarify, by 95% - I didn't mean per figure. I bet I could find an Anakin or Klaatu skiff which was c10 - I doubt I could ever find a c-3po or farmboy luke.
 
Condition is very much a matter of opinion. I am quite fussy about the condition of my loose figures. I like them to be unplayed with, as mint as possible and with no paint rubbed off the painted parts. But as mentioned I do realise some figures have slight factory paint errors and imperfections, it can be part of their charm. Also as we all know some figures have a lot more painted parts or are more prone to paint loss. Some have very little paint on them and are easy to find minty. I think each person knows what they're looking for and that's fair enough. I actually enjoy the hunt for minty figures and variants, its part of my enjoyment of the hobby. I have bought quite a few figures from you Iain and the quality has been superb but I think I've asked for extra pics of a couple of figures and then refused them. It's bound to happen, nothing personal and as long as you communicate in a polite way about it. Agree though, absolute perfection is unrealistic with most figures but some can be near as damned flawless, like the Luke Jedi you just sent me 8)
 
Robstyley said:
I have bought quite a few figures from you Iain and the quality has been superb but I think I've asked for extra pics of a couple of figures and then refused them. It's bound to happen, nothing personal and as long as you communicate in a polite way about it. Agree though, absolute perfection is unrealistic with most figures but some can be near as damned flawless, like the Luke Jedi you just sent me 8)

Rob - don't get me wrong - I have no issues with people asking for extra pictures and don't for one minute think that I have a divine right to sell anything just because I have taken those pictures - as I say, I'd rather to give you extra pictures to make your choice than have someone turn round to me later on and say that something wasn't mentioned.

When eBay relaxed the charges for extra pictures then I took full advantage of this and normally post up a minimum of 7 pictures with each figure - and highlight the flaws (if there are any) because I know that a lot of eBay sellers don't

My 'frustration' is just about managing people's expectations on what to expect from figures and this whole 'C10' requirement
 
C10 is overrated.

Shaun Neinest goes up to C11.

http://m.ebay.com/itm/1997-Hasbro-Star-Wars-POTF-Endor-Rebel-Soldier-Loose-Complete-Figure-C11-/310751786031

:-p

Jason
 
Id like to chime in here. I like to consider both Iain and Max friends in this hobby. Iain ive known for a few years and he is a true gentleman who is probably one of the best sellers i have come across and Max is a long time collector whom i remember from 2002 onwards on RS and who is also a great guy.

There isnt anything such as a C10 in my eyes, but it is us collectors who set a precedent as to what is and isnt that good. Its like AFA having a few MOC AFA 100 gem mint figures floating about (both vintage and modern) which quite frankly is bullshit as any figure that would have come off a production line would have even the tiniest perfection. Its the same with all collecting areas, whether it be figures, cards, comics or whatever. Gem mint doesnt neccessarily mean its the most perfect example ever, its just a designated name/grade by one person.

The figure Iain showed was a very good example of a mint Han, and ive seen the same imperfection before on the same character figure. However, lets take another figure from later down the line such as a Yakface. Now this is one figure that people will call C10 if it hasnt got even a hint of paintloss, and ive seen it many times over the years. We are crossing the lines of judging by rarity paired with condition. Yakface is easier to find mint that most of the other figures from the line, purely down to the fact that it was an end of line figure and wasnt really a huge seller back in the day. However, it still cannot justify a C10 grade, as grading is subjective. As someone said, one mans C9 is anothers C8 and its about time we found common ground. The problem is that too many people buy on a whim from a poorly listed item, which has little photographic visibility but is stated as C9-C10 when in truth it is of lesser condition. If only all sellers listed pieces like Iain, this hobby would be a lot more easy to manovure around.

Rare shouldnt be confused with condition either, and too often they are mismatched which causes added confusion. What Max is after is acheiveable, whereas he wants a mint set of the first 12 but it will take time and patience. In the scheme of things, the first 12 are very hard to find in MINT condition, but it can be done. However, the further down the line we go the easier it becomes to obtain cheaper figures. This is why many collectors (myself included) have opened MOC figures in the late 90,s early 2000,s to complete a loose set. Sometimes, the availablilty of carded examples can be easier than the loose. I remember when i opened a Tri Amanaman and POTF Warok and Romba to complete my run years ago, but i bought all 3 for LESS than the loose price-figure that out???

Thank feck i collect anything, even if its slightly beaten or ripped as to me it has more character ;) I do understand why both got frustrated here, but at least it can be discussed civil on this forum - and thats coming from me!!! :D

Lee
 
You make some good points there Lee. You can't rely on a description of the condition, C this or that or "mint". It's just bollocks, means nothing. I only ever go by good pictures these days. A sharp photo doesn't lie. Regardless of what a listing says if it doesn't have good photos I don't give it the time of day and if its highish value it should have loads of good pictures from all sides. The bottom line is people bullshit left right and centre to try to inflate the value and appeal of the item :|
 
No vintage toy is C10 or mint and if such a thing existed (which it doesn't) you would be petrified to go near it or have a breakdown if you ever discovered a mark on it. Life is too short.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top