Matthieu
Padawan
Following up on Frank's latest thread about value vs/ rarity, I thought I would start this chat about a matter that has been annoying me a lot lately.
I see more and more listings, posts or videos from professional or semi-professional dealers but also collectors who boast owning or selling a "rare" grading item with a very small "pop" (population report) number.
I just can't get my head around on how a pop number should have any significance when it comes to assessing rarity or value. An item gets graded because its owner decided to send it in for grading. There is a wide range of Star Wars toys, production and prototypes, that are not graded or of which very few examples are graded, just because their owners do not do grading. For example, a lot of old school high-end collectors, including collectors from the US, just do not care about grading, while they own the most rare and valuable items. Also, European collectors who collect local releases (e.g. Meccano, Trilogo...) do not have their items graded because sending in to the US is too risky and UKG is not viewed as a worthy option.
Apart from a couple MOC's I have in my collection that I bought already graded, none of my Meccano / Trilogo MOCs is graded. Some of them (when I say "some" I could say "all"!) have a very small "pop" number whereas they are not particularly rare.
I am not implying that grading is bad or that it does not add any value: I do understand that collectors find it cool to have nice and rare items graded, sometimes it can even be very useful in order to authenticate an item (the only one item I ever sent in to AFA is a K. Simmons' photo sample). I also do believe it adds value (although not as much value as dealers would claim). I just don't think the number of graded examples for a particular item should be taken into account when it comes to assessing value / rarity.
What are your thoughts?
I see more and more listings, posts or videos from professional or semi-professional dealers but also collectors who boast owning or selling a "rare" grading item with a very small "pop" (population report) number.
I just can't get my head around on how a pop number should have any significance when it comes to assessing rarity or value. An item gets graded because its owner decided to send it in for grading. There is a wide range of Star Wars toys, production and prototypes, that are not graded or of which very few examples are graded, just because their owners do not do grading. For example, a lot of old school high-end collectors, including collectors from the US, just do not care about grading, while they own the most rare and valuable items. Also, European collectors who collect local releases (e.g. Meccano, Trilogo...) do not have their items graded because sending in to the US is too risky and UKG is not viewed as a worthy option.
Apart from a couple MOC's I have in my collection that I bought already graded, none of my Meccano / Trilogo MOCs is graded. Some of them (when I say "some" I could say "all"!) have a very small "pop" number whereas they are not particularly rare.
I am not implying that grading is bad or that it does not add any value: I do understand that collectors find it cool to have nice and rare items graded, sometimes it can even be very useful in order to authenticate an item (the only one item I ever sent in to AFA is a K. Simmons' photo sample). I also do believe it adds value (although not as much value as dealers would claim). I just don't think the number of graded examples for a particular item should be taken into account when it comes to assessing value / rarity.
What are your thoughts?