RS Supports Replicator Boxes

X8Ufi.gif
 
I can't stand that AussieF - I really wish he would come on here just so we can tell him to **** right off chap.

Of course there are worse problems in the world that Darren Ormes shitty little boxes - but that is a vintage star wars forum - hence we are discussing vintage star wars items - obviously if I went on a general news forum to discuss their awful impact into the hobby then I'd be laughed away - and quite rightly

It is the same sort of mentality as the 'only toys' brigade - of course we know they're only ****ing toys - but we like them and we want to collect them - and if you have a problem about that then **** off back to your professional fishing you twat
 
if he made them for himself id be like good copy of originals. but he's selling them and making **** loads of money for 7 years now. i dread to think how many boxes are in circulation before he added the R on them!
 
With that Dartprimes theory...only toys he actually had as child are worth anything.....so with that thinking why purchase anything beyond your original toys you owned. ****tard keeps talking to himself too.

and I agree...there are bigger issues in the world............but we are on a toy forum you stupid ****.
 
I guess they would take these over a real one anyday :D

http://www.lovehoney.co.uk/sex-toys/male-sex-toys/realistic-vaginas/
 
:lol: :lol: :shock:

Great stuff lads...

@Todd, didn'y know you was an IT Crowd fan, especially over there in the States. Great show and thats a great clip :wink:
 
Quote from AllanB directed at the promoter of the Orme bollocks:

Over ten years ago people were already talking about what a terrible attitude you had, "how you had been around for far too long" & that you were "a problem". Throw in the whole Bill Cable situation et al, & really, who the hell can argue with them.

-------------------------------------

Any ideas what this is about?
 
Old Thread: Hello . There have been no replies in this thread for 365 days.
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant.
Perhaps it would be better to start a new thread instead.
Back
Top Bottom