palitoyjunky
Sith Lord
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2009
- Messages
- 3,017
There is no mathematical calculation on the sub grades regarding the overall grade given to a piece :!:
It all comes down to opinion :!: For example I have a carded Luke Bespin AFA 80 subs C80 B85 F85. The card in this case was the factor in the opinion of AFA that overall governed the look of the piece with a light but noticeable surface crease top left of card and noticeable wear on the back of the card. So these card defects were what stood out most to AFA when looking at the overall piece hence the 80 grade. I also have an AFA 85 Han Solo C85 B85 F80. In this case the defects on the figure which r slight discolouration of the arms and a decay of colour on the face did not out weigh the virtually mint card and bubble in the view of AFA hence the 85 grade. I do find a lot of the time that the grade of the card determines the overall grade providing of course there is no massive defect on the bubble or figure.
It all comes down to opinion :!: For example I have a carded Luke Bespin AFA 80 subs C80 B85 F85. The card in this case was the factor in the opinion of AFA that overall governed the look of the piece with a light but noticeable surface crease top left of card and noticeable wear on the back of the card. So these card defects were what stood out most to AFA when looking at the overall piece hence the 80 grade. I also have an AFA 85 Han Solo C85 B85 F80. In this case the defects on the figure which r slight discolouration of the arms and a decay of colour on the face did not out weigh the virtually mint card and bubble in the view of AFA hence the 85 grade. I do find a lot of the time that the grade of the card determines the overall grade providing of course there is no massive defect on the bubble or figure.