my new favourite description method.

TrooperWill

Padawan
Joined
Nov 4, 2017
Messages
90
my new favourite description method, sod describing the broken, dirty, incomplete wreck you see before me, ill copy something from a wiki :lol: :lol:

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Star-Wars-Millennium-Falcon-Vehicle-Vintage-Toy-Incomplete-Boxed-Kenner-Rare/123146377419?_trkparms=aid%3D555018%26algo%3DPL.SIM%26ao%3D2%26asc%3D20160908110712%26meid%3D61ff80a81f52470fbefe406e7628421c%26pid%3D100677%26rk%3D2%26rkt%3D30%26sd%3D401486228965%26itm%3D123146377419&_trksid=p2385738.c100677.m4598#viTabs_0
 
WOW :shock:

That is some description, very professionaly written, must have took him ages to copy and paste :lol: :lol: :lol:
 
I'm surprised the lazy sod didn't also just grab the first picture he spotted on google images..... or maybe he did? :shock:

Toystrust?... more like Toycrust!
 
StarWarsFan said:
:shock: :lol: talk about plagiarism
OK!

Plagiarism is the "wrongful appropriation" and "stealing and publication" of another author's "language, thoughts, ideas, or expressions" and the representation of them as one's own original work.[1][2]

Plagiarism is considered academic dishonesty and a breach of journalistic ethics. It is subject to sanctions like penalties, suspension, and even expulsion. Recently, cases of "extreme plagiarism" have been identified in academia.[3] The modern concept of plagiarism as immoral and originality as an ideal emerged in Europe in the 18th century, particularly with the Romantic movement.

Plagiarism is not in itself a crime, but can constitute copyright infringement. In academia and industry, it is a serious ethical offense.[4][5] Plagiarism and copyright infringement overlap to a considerable extent, but they are not equivalent concepts, and many types of plagiarism do not constitute copyright infringement, which is defined by copyright law and may be adjudicated by courts. Plagiarism is not defined or punished by law, but rather by institutions (including professional associations, educational institutions, and commercial entities, such as publishing companies).


Alright, fair enough - I couldn't be bothered to type that myself so I nicked it from Wikipedia! :wink:
 
peekaygee73 said:
StarWarsFan said:
:shock: :lol: talk about plagiarism
OK!

Plagiarism is the "wrongful appropriation" and "stealing and publication" of ...[snip].

Alright, fair enough - I couldn't be bothered to type that myself so I nicked it from Wikipedia! :wink:

:lol: :lol: :lol: just spilt my tea reading these posts :lol: :lol: :lol:
 
peekaygee73 said:
StarWarsFan said:
:shock: :lol: talk about plagiarism
OK!

Plagiarism is the "wrongful appropriation" and "stealing and publication" of another author's "language, thoughts, ideas, or expressions" and the representation of them as one's own original work.[1][2]

Plagiarism is considered academic dishonesty and a breach of journalistic ethics. It is subject to sanctions like penalties, suspension, and even expulsion. Recently, cases of "extreme plagiarism" have been identified in academia.[3] The modern concept of plagiarism as immoral and originality as an ideal emerged in Europe in the 18th century, particularly with the Romantic movement.

Plagiarism is not in itself a crime, but can constitute copyright infringement. In academia and industry, it is a serious ethical offense.[4][5] Plagiarism and copyright infringement overlap to a considerable extent, but they are not equivalent concepts, and many types of plagiarism do not constitute copyright infringement, which is defined by copyright law and may be adjudicated by courts. Plagiarism is not defined or punished by law, but rather by institutions (including professional associations, educational institutions, and commercial entities, such as publishing companies).


Alright, fair enough - I couldn't be bothered to type that myself so I nicked it from Wikipedia! :wink:

I have just let out a little wee :lol: :lol: :lol:
 
Ruby2511 said:
peekaygee73 said:
StarWarsFan said:
:shock: :lol: talk about plagiarism
OK!

Plagiarism is the "wrongful appropriation" and "stealing and publication" of another author's "language, thoughts, ideas, or expressions" and the representation of them as one's own original work.[1][2]

Plagiarism is considered academic dishonesty and a breach of journalistic ethics. It is subject to sanctions like penalties, suspension, and even expulsion. Recently, cases of "extreme plagiarism" have been identified in academia.[3] The modern concept of plagiarism as immoral and originality as an ideal emerged in Europe in the 18th century, particularly with the Romantic movement.

Plagiarism is not in itself a crime, but can constitute copyright infringement. In academia and industry, it is a serious ethical offense.[4][5] Plagiarism and copyright infringement overlap to a considerable extent, but they are not equivalent concepts, and many types of plagiarism do not constitute copyright infringement, which is defined by copyright law and may be adjudicated by courts. Plagiarism is not defined or punished by law, but rather by institutions (including professional associations, educational institutions, and commercial entities, such as publishing companies).


Alright, fair enough - I couldn't be bothered to type that myself so I nicked it from Wikipedia! :wink:

I have just let out a little wee :lol: :lol: :lol:

:lol: :lol: :lol
 
peekaygee73 said:
StarWarsFan said:
:shock: :lol: talk about plagiarism
OK!

Plagiarism is the "wrongful appropriation" and "stealing and publication" of another author's "language, thoughts, ideas, or expressions" and the representation of them as one's own original work.[1][2]

Plagiarism is considered academic dishonesty and a breach of journalistic ethics. It is subject to sanctions like penalties, suspension, and even expulsion. Recently, cases of "extreme plagiarism" have been identified in academia.[3] The modern concept of plagiarism as immoral and originality as an ideal emerged in Europe in the 18th century, particularly with the Romantic movement.

Plagiarism is not in itself a crime, but can constitute copyright infringement. In academia and industry, it is a serious ethical offense.[4][5] Plagiarism and copyright infringement overlap to a considerable extent, but they are not equivalent concepts, and many types of plagiarism do not constitute copyright infringement, which is defined by copyright law and may be adjudicated by courts. Plagiarism is not defined or punished by law, but rather by institutions (including professional associations, educational institutions, and commercial entities, such as publishing companies).


Alright, fair enough - I couldn't be bothered to type that myself so I nicked it from Wikipedia! :wink:

:D :lol:
 
Oracle said:
peekaygee73 said:
StarWarsFan said:
:shock: :lol: talk about plagiarism
OK!

Plagiarism is the "wrongful appropriation" and "stealing and publication" of ...[snip].

Alright, fair enough - I couldn't be bothered to type that myself so I nicked it from Wikipedia! :wink:

:lol: :lol: :lol: just spilt my tea reading these posts :lol: :lol: :lol:

:D
 
Been saying for a long time sellers on feebay cannot be bothered to list correctly. They can't describe accurate. It's getting a joke. How the admin at feebay allow this to continue is beyond me.
 
Tony jedi said:
Been saying for a long time sellers on feebay cannot be bothered to list correctly. They can't describe accurate. It's getting a joke. How the admin at feebay allow this to continue is beyond me.

I love the ones who list a vintage figure/toy and give it the highly detailed title saying "Vintage Star Wars", not even bothering to put the word 'figure' in it, or the characters name.

Then followed by an awesome full description saying "Good condition"

Lazy ass ****ers!! :lol:
 
Old Thread: Hello . There have been no replies in this thread for 365 days.
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant.
Perhaps it would be better to start a new thread instead.
Back
Top Bottom