Oh Todd, what are you playing policeman? prosecutor? Judge?
I dont have to explain my actions to you, but will do IN GOOD FAITH to stop confusions, can you write that way, good faith? I have my opinion of you also, but have the good taste of no expressing it.
1) answering your and Richard´s question, NO, I HAVENT SUPPLIED HIM PICTURES OF ANY BOXED STAR WARS KENNER TOYS, NOT PROMOTIONAL ITEMS LIKE THE BELL YOU MENTION, NOR PARTS OF ANY REAL KENNER VINTAGE PACKAGE, NOR ANY STAR WARS VINTAGE PACKAGE. I thought that was clear. You will have to keep looking for the source, Im not.
What I supplied him were the pictures I mentioned before, pictures that I took at his request OF MY OWN FIRST 12 STAR WARS ACTION FIGURES IN LOOSE CONDITION, pictures that he didnt used, I already explained that very clearly: HOW THE CONTACT WAS PRODUCED AMONG US, THE EXTENSION OF HIS REQUEST AND WHAT I GAVE HIM, I still have the photos in my computer, do you want to see them?. There is no crime in taking pictures of my own property and give them to him. About that bell, I strongly understand he doesnt had a real scan of the promotional bell you mention, and matter of the problem, so he was trying to design one from scratch in photoshop. Can a homemade promotional bell made with photos of the figures of other guy qualify as a "REPRODUCTION". Dont think so. That is more a college science project.
Of course I sent him the sketches, images and instructions for the design of my own box for my sandtrooper project, but I guess that does not qualify to your inquiry.
2) You state: "You must be supplying him images for other uses than your custom work" , again you are stating what you want to believe, not necesarilly what it is. The problem is you state that as a fact, so I must ask you, do you have proof? real evidence? not just circunstancial screen captures of a different secenario that work for your twisted theory?
3) Im sorry if it bothers you my tendency to write "long paragraphs", we are from different societies, further than that, we belong to different worlds. A simple yes or no is not enough for me, I dont think in binary. Maybe you should read the long extention of what Im saying in my statements instead of looking a reason, or forge a reason, to declare me guilty, and you will not be asking the same question twice.
Anything else?