Macau Baggie

wampa

Padawan
Joined
Oct 19, 2006
Messages
55
Location
DEVON
Do made in Macau figures have a particular COO?
Does anyone have a Made in Macau baggie with a Han Solo large head in it?
 

gustie

Sith Lord
Joined
Mar 31, 2007
Messages
3,404
Location
Iceland
apart from the ones marked Macau or Macao, the others have erased COO

some ive seen are erased "hong Kong" and some others ive seen are erased "made in hong kong"
 

wampa

Padawan
Joined
Oct 19, 2006
Messages
55
Location
DEVON
gustie said:
apart from the ones marked Macau or Macao, the others have erased COO

some ive seen are erased "hong Kong" and some others ive seen are erased "made in hong kong"

So a Han in a Made in Macau baggie should have no COO?
 

gustie

Sith Lord
Joined
Mar 31, 2007
Messages
3,404
Location
Iceland
ok

i have a no coo china one of those - from china baggie

its no coo with the stamp inboard on the inside of the leg


maybe the same as yours?>
 

wampa

Padawan
Joined
Oct 19, 2006
Messages
55
Location
DEVON
gustie said:
ok

i have a no coo china one of those - from china baggie

its no coo with the stamp inboard on the inside of the leg


maybe the same as yours?>

I have a couple of han baggies, both of which i am unsure of, in terms of when/how they were released, a blank one-looks like a multipack perhaps-Han is large head with no coo as you describe.
But the macau, i do not know, i will upload some photos tomorrow when light is better, baggie has Made in Macau in red text across the bag, Han is large head and has Hong Kong COO
 

craignwo4life

Sith Lord
Joined
Oct 20, 2006
Messages
3,180
I've seen pictures of Han in a Macau baggie on RS years ago but I think the text was black and I cannot remember the COO. :?
 

wampa

Padawan
Joined
Oct 19, 2006
Messages
55
Location
DEVON
here are some photos:
DSC00774.jpg
[/img]

DSC00775.jpg
[/img]

DSC00776.jpg
[/img]
 

gustie

Sith Lord
Joined
Mar 31, 2007
Messages
3,404
Location
Iceland
heres my china no coo
nocoohansolo.jpg



the stamp is on the inside legs


looks like the macau is a bit different - on the back of leg instead of inside leg


would this be considered a normal no coo also if not in a baggie? or is the stamp unique to the macau baggies?
 

wampa

Padawan
Joined
Oct 19, 2006
Messages
55
Location
DEVON
well the figure in the plain baggie has no COO, looks very similar to the one you show but the Macau baggie figure has a Made in Hong Kong COO, thats what i am confused about, I thought Macau figures had the COO erased?
 

wampa

Padawan
Joined
Oct 19, 2006
Messages
55
Location
DEVON
gustie said:
hmmm

maybe uli would be good to ask


PS how good is your glasslite chewie ur selling??!

Yep, Uli-variation master :D

Chewie is good-apart from rub on nose, he is a bit of a brown nose! :oops:
crap joke, sorry, i'll get my coat
 

craignwo4life

Sith Lord
Joined
Oct 20, 2006
Messages
3,180
Had a quick look on RS to see if I could find the thread and came across photos of ones in red text from a certain seller...... is that why you are querying them?
 

wampa

Padawan
Joined
Oct 19, 2006
Messages
55
Location
DEVON
craignwo4life said:
Had a quick look on RS to see if I could find the thread and came across photos of ones in red text from a certain seller...... is that why you are querying them?

i just want to make sure they are kosher before i sell them, any input would be good
these are part of a lot being sold by me to raise funds to refund people who bought the now infamous sample baggies around a year ago

i hope i can sell some items, refund and close the door on it
 

spoons

Grand Master
Joined
Oct 22, 2006
Messages
8,314
I've got a MIHK Parker baggie with a no COO Han Hoth, I'm in two minds over its authenticity

sorry but that probably doesn't help much
 

wampa

Padawan
Joined
Oct 19, 2006
Messages
55
Location
DEVON
spoons said:
I've got a MIHK Parker baggie with a no COO Han Hoth, I'm in two minds over its authenticity

sorry but that probably doesn't help much

there seem to be a few dodgy baggies floating around??
 
Old Thread: Hello . There have been no replies in this thread for 365 days.
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant.
Perhaps it would be better to start a new thread instead.
Top Bottom