Long Time suspected FAKE baggies scam / seller

Star Wars Forum UK - British Fan Community for Toys, Movies & Collecting

Help Support Star Wars Forum UK:

edd_jedi said:
Exactly, we're arguing over the definition of fake here. There are bigger fish to fry.

That's fine. You want to deal with the matter through condescension, I'll keep that in mind when I look at the evidence in it's totality.

But I've already made up my mind on the thoroughness and accuracy of this expose based on this response.

Best of luck, you're going to need it.
 
finestcomics said:
But I've already made up my mind on the thoroughness and accuracy of this expose based on this response.

You've based the accuracy of Frank's expose on the fact you don't like some of the things I am saying? I as in the guy who said he probably has the least in this, two baggies? you're a troll, simple as that. Stop wasting our time.
 
The OP (who I believe has not posted on this thread yet) just added this to the Facebook group. He will apparently post the original emails here soon. For now blurring out his real name because I have no idea what his forum username is.

A PBP exclusive figure in a Palitoy baggie which would obviously never have existed

pbp.png


pbp-back.jpg
 
People are getting hung up on fake baggies vs touched up baggies? Isn't that not seeing the forest for the trees?

Maybe there needs to be a distinction between "the fakes" and "the touch ups". Maybe even separate "expose" threads. The common ground here though is that both should not have been sold (or at least not without disclosure in the case of the touch ups).

Whether Jeff is a nice guy or not should be separated from the discussion. Some evil people are the sweetest people in the world in person. Some of the most straight laced guys in the world can be total dicks (like me, lol). Personality is just not a good indication of whether someone is guilty or innocent in a situation like this.

The facts presented are this. A percentage of the excessively numerous baggies he has sold are fake, touched up, or both. The exact number is unknown, but it seems fair based on evidence it's somewhere in the neighbourhood of 5% or so. Someone presented a photo of two Fett's that were denied grading due to figure touch up as well (although it's not clear these are attributed to sales from Jeff). Also fact is that there have been a few "watch out" threads over the last few years (here and on RS) about fake/touched up baggies sold by Jeff. Frank has said he has explained some of these tell tale signs of bad baggies to Jeff, and there seems to be evidence he has continued selling some he was advised against.

If we can get past personal connections, bitching about how he was exposed, whether he faked them or bought them that way, squabbles about fake vs touch ups, etc., then he needs to be called out on his selling practices, if nothing else. Countless others have been called out in the past for selling fakes and touch ups. Many of those people were otherwise "nice people", and many sold legit items as well, yet were hammered here and elsewhere. What about Shaun Neinast? That guy has been told about his repro sales, yet continues to sell them (among legit items) - and he is one of the most vilified names in the hobby. By no means am I trying to place Jeff into the same category - but there are similarities, more so if some of the insinuations based on his sales end up being true. Best case is he's clueless and just sells what he has in a vacuum of knowledge regarding which are authentic. Worst case is he produces these, sells them to scam people, and puts on the nice guy act to feign innocence. The truth is likely somewhere in the middle, but is mostly unimportant compared to the bigger issue.

Let's stop the infighting, and concentrate on how to continue getting the word out on spotting fakes/touch ups already sold, and to stop Jeff from selling more of them in the future.

Ian
 
I thought the excessive ink/bleeding 'Alt font" Palitoy SW-b MIHK baggie was considered legit?.....ropey but real?
 
edd_jedi said:
finestcomics said:
But I've already made up my mind on the thoroughness and accuracy of this expose based on this response.

You've based the accuracy of Frank's expose on the fact you don't like some of the things I am saying? I as in the guy who said he probably has the least in this, two baggies? you're a troll, simple as that. Stop wasting our time.
you need to chill your beans edd
 
I've wanted to comment earlier but stuck at work and unable to.

Bootyhunter said:
It seems to me that some of you guys are going to stand by Jeff regardless

Not at all; if i see someone who isn't able to defend himself, get the **** kicked out of him by a group of guys, I'll do my best as a human being to intervene. It's will be likely that we are all gonna get hurt but at least my conscience will be clear. That's what separates us from the animals.

Regardless of who they are or what they may or may not have done, you don't just watch someone bleed.

I've not been in the collecting world for that long all things considered. The only big scandal I've seen is the TT scandal which was an entirely different kettle of fish as clearly explained by others.

No one has come out of this well: Jeff, Frank, Edd, (the entire accusation team), SWFUK, The Vintage Rebellion, the collecting community, all those who initially picked up the pitch forks, no one. This is all kinds of awful. I feel sick, I dare say most people do too.
I am sure that some people will think that this is irrecoverable and the forum won't be the same. It is recoverable and the forum will endure. Our love of the hobby is causing us to clash, our love for the hobby will also ultimately shine through and we will get through this. A bumpy ride but we will get there.

My 2ps worth.
Yes, the way this was initially presented was awful.
Yes, Jeff was accused of being a manufacturer of fake baggies.
The OP original unedited post: "as far as we can tell Jeff has been doing this for a long time (minimum 4 years), IMO making fake baggies / resealing genuine baggies with swapped out figures & has over that time been improving and trying to perfect those fakes"Yes, the podcast interview wasn't perfect. We had about 5/10 minutes to prepare. We tried our best to give the 'guilty man' a platform. We asked questions, most were questions from this thread.
Yes, there will always be fakes. Yes, there will always be doubt.
Yes, this has split our beloved community and yes I'm bloody gutted about that.
Yes, this was released whilst one of Jeff's biggest friends in the community was knowingly out of the country and on holiday. Maybe this was a shrewd chess play move, maybe it was a coincidence?
Yes, we are now seeing some screen shots and apparent evidence coming to light. It's odd that this wasn't in the OP. It appears that there are now more and more things coming out of the woodwork. I am keen to learn more.
Yes, there is evidence of these Red tape baggies being sold on Ebay (from feedback). It could be possible that these were sold before Jeff offered one to Frank? Not sure if we will ever know.
Yes this whole thing stinks and I have no doubt that dodgy baggies have been sold by Jeff. Knowingly or unwittingly I do not know. Only one man does.

That's obviously fake!!"We see only what we know" a science quote from Johann Wolfgang von Goethe.
Yes there is a lot of doubt over some of the ink quality, spacing, smudges etc. I see that. Just like now I can see an iron mark on an early TT which would have gone unnoticed beforehand. Now we have had it pointed out in big images we can easily see some of the 'obvious' issues. Yeah I totally see that some of these baggies are shockingly bad (home made).
Yes, Frank is upset about the Podcast. Sorry Frank, but that wasn't your choice. Much like Jeff didn't have a choice when you started this thread. You can't throw a hand grenade into a room then dictate where the blast will and won't go.
Yes, I think Jeff should come on to this thread. Anyone can join a forum.
Yes, we were hoping to have a Podcast Part 2 to match our Part 1. It appears that this is incredibly unlikely.

I have a question. Have any baggies come to light with a QC sticker?
Yes MOCs had a QC check. Show me a baggie with a QC sticker; I'm really keen to see one. Why are we so sure that these baggie types which differ so much aren't just different baggie types, different stamps etc. Did kenner etc really give a dam over the quality of these baggies? After all they were just sent in the post etc. maybe we give more of a monkeys about them than Kenner did. There aren't any baggie proofs or Cromalins as far as I'm aware.

There have been lots of keyboard warriors on here, especially initially. Lots of brave people, but having said that, you'd have to be blessed with pretty big balls to go to at least 4 Farthest From events and deliberately sell fake baggies to some of the most knowledgeable collectors in the business. Maybe, just maybe, all you are guilty of is being a bit unorganised, a bit naïve and a bit careless. Maybe you don't give a dam about other people. Maybe you have just been very clever. I just don't know.

I have no doubt that some of these baggies are fake. I have no doubt that Jeff has sold some.
To what extent I don't know.

What i do know is i liked Jeff when i met him just like i liked Frank when i met him. But this isn't about liking people.
What i do know, is you should never ever ever make libellous acquisitions in a public arena without having a watertight business case. The OP was wrong. That's one of the big things which immediately separated the community.

The whole community became divided because of the poor initial post. Regardless of the outcome, and I will stay tuned with interest, I am glad that we gave Jeff a platform to rapidly reply.

We will get through this.
 
finestcomics said:
Grant_C said:
Still waiting on evidence.

The "touch-up" talking points I brought up are obviously not being treated with the diligence the situation deserves.

So let's consider the word fake for a moment seeing as you are so interested in the finer points...


fake1
feɪk/
adjective
1.
not genuine; imitation or counterfeit.
"she got on the plane with a fake passport"
synonyms: forgery, counterfeit, copy, sham, fraud, hoax, imitation, mock-up, dummy, reproduction, lookalike, likeness; More
noun

I.e. The hand painted kenner logo on the bag is a copy/ imitation / reproduction / lookalike of the original. Ergo, "fake".
 
Regardless of the final result, it's clear that the baggie market will be badly affected. All the guides and info available hasn't stopped the plethora of TT queries about any and every type of carded figure (along the lines of 'is this Toltoys 12 back a TT'?), and many collectors swear off Palitoy Jedi and non-logo'd ESB as a result and i fear it will hit the baggie market even harder as naturally there is even less knowledge out there among more general collectors.

I own a grand total of 7 baggies (and i'm planning on selling 3 of them soon in a graded Jedi multipack) so I'm not invested in this personally. I do feel for the guys who are heavily invested, and appreciate they wouldn't have taken this decision lightly. Some will suffer far more than most and the bad taste this will leave will take a long time to go away. The decision to go public with this must be borne out of some pretty hard evidence otherwise it wouldn't make sense to rock the proverbial boat of one of the more niche parts of the hobby so significantly. I think we need to wait for that evidence to come to light rather than get caught in a bun fight over finer details.
 
Yes, I think Jeff should come on to this thread. Anyone can join a forum.
Yes, we were hoping to have a Podcast Part 2 to match our Part 1. It appears that this is incredibly unlikely.

I have a question. Have any baggies come to light with a QC sticker?
Yes MOCs had a QC check. Show me a baggie with a QC sticker; I'm really keen to see one. Why are we so sure that these baggie types which differ so much aren't just different baggie types, different stamps etc. Did kenner etc really give a dam over the quality of these baggies? After all they were just sent in the post etc. maybe we give more of a monkeys about them than Kenner did. There aren't any baggie proofs or Cromalins as far as I'm aware.

I agree with a lot of your post Jez, I would say I genuinely think it is unfair comparing being on a podcast to being on a forum. Not everybody comes across well, and now that Jeff has gained a lot of support by being a nice guy, Frank would have everything to lose especially as you would be better prepared to question him ( I am not saying you would be biased btw).

Whilst I fundamentally agree with your issue around the baggies, it is a reason I wouldn't own them, we have to decide if we are going to go with the the information and work uncovered, or because we have very little evidence we put everything as unknown? In which case baggies as a collectable are no more valuable than a mint figure. I suspect that is a conversation for a different thread though.
 
Just bumping up Marty's post as I think it was missed and thought it was interesting!

Marty _Norfleet said:
Hi, I bought these Palitoy Fett baggies from a guy in the UK in April. I sent them into AFA and they say not only did this figure not come in this type of baggie, they both have overlapping paint on the head and belt which differs in color texture and accuracy from the original paint underneath. I have posted some pictures under a blacklight. When AFA inform me about the baggies I gave them the go-ahead to inspect the figures. The main reason I bought these 2 figures was because I've been trying for years to find a near perfect example.

Don't know why pics aren't in the quote but they are on page 17.
 
Oli - I ignored that because it said 'guy in the UK'. Unless I'm missing something else there? Although I may read AFA report I trust them far less than I would Frank's comments when it comes to baggies.
 
Jez said:
I've wanted to comment earlier but stuck at work and unable to.

Yes, this was released whilst one of Jeff's biggest friends in the community was knowingly out of the country and on holiday. Maybe this was a shrewd chess play move, maybe it was a coincidence?

That was the one thing over everything else I was wondering about myself and maybe thats why the initial post was rushed to get it out there quick while his friend was away even though I dont know who this guy is as only hear hes in las vegas unless i missed his name.

Everyone wants to be right and i know some might be annoying or wind ups, i re read some of mine and sounded like a prick but i really dont think name calling to others is a adult way of dealing with things.
 
Just to be clear these two pieces came from Jeff Glanville. He said (Its a real sham they have been removed from the baggies as I would of offered you a refund on return.)
If the baggies are fake and the figures have been tampered with, what does it matter that they are not in the baggies?
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20170112-173700.png
    Screenshot_20170112-173700.png
    116.1 KB
  • Screenshot_20170112-173214.png
    Screenshot_20170112-173214.png
    142 KB
  • Screenshot_20170112-173248.png
    Screenshot_20170112-173248.png
    125.3 KB
I think Marty's post was waiting to be approved hence he didn't follow up with more info at the time.

Then it all got lost amongst the arguing about terminology and "the way it was handled" :-)
 
May 2013 Teebo is purchased on ebay presumably by Jeff
bought teebo.PNG


August 2013 send frank a picture with the logray baggie, a pruneface baggie, and an empty baggie and offers them to him. Frank does not say outright they are fake but says that no star wars toys have been confirmed to be in these and they are from strawberry shortcake line as well as saying their authenticity is questionable.

email to frank.PNG

baggies frank saw.PNG


September 2014 Sold the logray baggie with red text on ebay This baggie was not seen prior, but this sale is after Frank has said these baggies are questionable and can not be confirmed

sold logray.PNG


Just a few things I have put together so far by doing my own digging. I am presuming the teebos are the saem as they look the same to me, but the purchase of the teebo is irrelevant anyway since the sale of the logray is after the email to frank is where the main point is.
 
Is it not within the realms of probability that these could have been issued from some factory or another in these red text baggies? For whatever reason?

With all due respect to Frank, not everyting is known or indeed catalogued - even in 2016 new discoveries are made.

So is there a chance they could be legit from BITD or are we saying categorically that these do not and should not exist?
 
trappedtexan said:
September 2014 Sold the logray baggie with red text on ebay This baggie was not seen prior, but this sale is after Frank has said these baggies are questionable and can not be confirmed

Great find - that is 100% the same one Jeff sold, the description matches perfectly:

VINTAGE STARWARS LOGRAY RED TEXT MIHK BAGGIE

file.php


So we now have a confirmed date of when that baggie was sold, a year after Frank told Jeff they were dodgy.
 
SublevelStudios said:
With all due respect to Frank, not everyting is known or indeed catalogued - even in 2016 new discoveries are made. So is there a chance they could be legit from BITD or are we saying categorically that these do not and should not exist?

I agree but the point here is Jeff said he had not sold anything Frank told him was fake. He even said he did not sell these exact baggies in the podcast interview.
 
edd_jedi said:
SublevelStudios said:
With all due respect to Frank, not everyting is known or indeed catalogued - even in 2016 new discoveries are made. So is there a chance they could be legit from BITD or are we saying categorically that these do not and should not exist?

I agree but the point here is Jeff said he had not sold anything Frank told him was fake. He even said he did not sell these exact baggies in the podcast interview.

But Frank didn't outright say they were fake in that email, he just said in his opinion they were iffy as they were only issued with SS products.
 
edd_jedi said:
SublevelStudios said:
With all due respect to Frank, not everyting is known or indeed catalogued - even in 2016 new discoveries are made. So is there a chance they could be legit from BITD or are we saying categorically that these do not and should not exist?

I agree but the point here is Jeff said he had not sold anything Frank told him was fake. He even said he did not sell these exact baggies in the podcast interview.

Also goes against the whole "I'm selling my collection" story if he's buying/reselling from eBay.
 
Not sure if you've listened to the podcast but the guys asked Jeff straight if he sold any of the red text baggies on eBay. He said no. This proves that was untrue.
 
edd_jedi said:
Not sure if you've listened to the podcast but the guys asked Jeff straight if he sold any of the red text baggies on eBay. He said no. This proves that was untrue.
yup heard that too, I thought if it was a long time ago maybe he forgot but surely only 3 years ago you would remember what you have sold irrelevant of how many you sell
 
edd_jedi said:
Not sure if you've listened to the podcast but the guys asked Jeff straight if he sold any of the red text baggies on eBay. He said no. This proves that was untrue.

You got me on that one.
 
This is from the interview at 58 mins in...

"I'm just going to ask you a question that's a bit specific about baggies with red text..." Rich

"I've never sold any one with red text. I sent pictures of the red text baggies, I still got em in my collection I never sold em" Jeff
 
SublevelStudios said:
Is it not within the realms of probability that these could have been issued from some factory or another in these red text baggies? For whatever reason?

With all due respect to Frank, not everyting is known or indeed catalogued - even in 2016 new discoveries are made.

So is there a chance they could be legit from BITD or are we saying categorically that these do not and should not exist?

If we are going down that road no baggies are fakes
 
Looking at that red text sale, I could forgive him forgetting, but selling it as a very rare item? No warnings of potential veracity despite knowing it may be a problem. Big no no. Still doesn't mean we hang Jeff out for the non proven things.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top