Bubble lifting on my Fett.. how much effect the grade?

I can see one mentioned on this page:-

http://www.starwarsforum.co.uk/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=11326&start=1035

There's no picture of the back though, would want to verify that. I don't recall there being many AFA graded 65 backs at 85 and above (toygrader.com
is currently down so I can't get stats). The example on that thread is an extreme colour misprint card, with iron on bubble with V stem mark between
the double stems of the bubble, so wouldn't have fooled AFA you'd hope.

Jason
 
toygrader.com is back. There are 2 graded at 85 and above for 65 back palitoy boba fett. That leads me to believe that if the one shown on the thread
with iron marks on it is a 65 back, then any other 65 back cards were mismatch colour as well, and thus easily spotted.

cheers Jason
 
One last thing Jason :) i do remember Toni having loads of Fett 45 and 65 backs for sale when i bought my Tri Fett in 1999.

I think this needs to be stated, and 65 backs as possible fakes.
 
Palitoy78 said:
So that means 65 backs are affected aswell Jason?

Glad thats been cleared up :)

Still want to see the back of the card. Given the low AFA population score, I think any 65 back cards are color mismatches and iron on jobs, so unlikely to be
fooling anyone.

cheers Jason
 
No Jason, my point is its not just AFA cards affected. People will be wiser now, but surely some 65,s are floating around...
 
Palitoy78 said:
No Jason, my point is its not just AFA cards affected. People will be wiser now, but surely some 65,s are floating around...

Maybe, but the only example I have seen so far is the colour mismatch one with iron marks and V mark (which I still need to see the reverse side of to verify).

Google images for 'palitoy 65 back boba' only throws up 65 backs which look legitimate as well.

Need something more to go on.

cheers Jason
 
Old Thread: Hello . There have been no replies in this thread for 365 days.
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant.
Perhaps it would be better to start a new thread instead.
Back
Top Bottom