British Media Angers Me

Stuart Skinner

Sith Lord
Joined
Apr 29, 2013
Messages
3,165
It has been a tough year with Celebrity deaths. My vinyl collection growing up was full of David Bowie, Prince and Wham, so to lose the artists all at such a young age was a sad time. But losing Carrie Fisher last week hit me pretty hard, for someone who I had spent perhaps 3 minutes with (and so glad I did), I can't quite understand why it's upset me so much. Just goes to show how much of a hold Star Wars has on me/us.

When Carrie passed, I thought I'd buy most of the papers the following day documenting her death. I was hoping for celebrations of her life, her work documented, photos and beautiful stories of her life. Instead all I read, in all papers not just the red tops, was her drug and alcohol addictions over the years, her failed relationships. In fact the Sun had managed in 24 hours to find a friend (or so called friend) of Carries to tell them they she THINKS Carrie had fallen off the wagon, and I emphasise the word thinks, Sun obviously covering themselves. The friend had also supplied a photo of Carrie on thanks giving with an empty beer bottle in the background. What does that prove? Someone was taken the photo, could the beer bottle possibly be theres, course not, lets state Carrie had fallen off the wagon because of an empty bottle of beer. Typical of such a worthless paper.

It wasn't just The Sun though, Express, Mirror, Mail were all equally as poor and the Times even touched on her dark past, making sure they stated she was hooked on coke during the filming of Jedi.

Yesterday my recycling went out and with it all the papers. We all know about Carries demons of the past it had been well documented over the years and shes always been open about it and spoke about it freely. I just find it such a sad state of affairs that when someone dies we can't just celebrate their life and rejoice their work and personality. Typical of the British press, all they give us time and time again is inflated negative bullshit.
 
Its got to the stage I believe myself about 90% of what we read and watch in the news media is screened, and filtered so much its impossible to know the truth on the topic that's being reported on. Plus other times it is deliberately being faked which can lead to very dangerous situations being created around the world.
I like Denzels view on it.
[youtube]O3P1tV6TP-c[/youtube]
 
I literally won't even touch a copy of the S*n. I wouldn't wipe my ass with it. I couldn't do that to my ****.
Their behaviour after the Hillsborough disaster was so far beyond a disgrace I don't even have words for it. :evil: :twisted:
 
I used to buy and read The Sun regularly as the Sport content was great. Think it was Brian Woolnough or something like that.

Now, I refuse to buy any papers. Had my eyes really opened to the Daily Mail with reading Lee Bullock's facebook posts. Truly shocking and national embarrassments.
 
You lot should try Fox News out here - in the UK you'd think it was satire it is so right wing

Denzil is right though - you need to read the 'news' so you know what opinions the masses are forming - those in the Remain Camp and in the Democratic Party out here would have been wise to have done that
 
Journalists in general, all a bunch of self absorbed sensationalist cunts. Even the so-called "respectable" ones like Jon Snow always go in with the rudest and most awkward question first when interviewing people, how about a little respect before you start trying to dig the dirt that you think will get you ratings. It's why I avoid watching the news, I don't want to watch people having arranged arguments, I see that at work every day.
 
It is sad, isn't of?
With the autopsy of George Michael having taken place you could almost imagine the "journalists" hoping it would be something that they could get their hooks into a scandal.

When Carrie died, one headline was along the lines of farewell to a "spaced out princess".
Completely uncalled for and the editor should be ashamed.
 
It's not just journalists and newspapers, sadly its prevalent throughout all of society and the commercial world we all live in. Having worked in the field, I am fully aware that there are numerous drafts of books pre-written against a very long list of names that the publishers and of course the likes of WHSmith, Waterstones and Amazon are literally waiting to die... ambulance chasing style. To the point that they need a certain amount of celebrity/royal/sports personality deaths to hit the budgets that they have made based on the ins and outs of sales driven by these things the year before.
2016 for these folk (and the newspapers) will have been a boon year, they will though all be sh*tting themselves how they will show growth year on year against such a slew of death and mourning... and public interest of course!
 
On a similar theme I remember Alex Best (ex wife of George) very classily re-released her autobiography a few months after George died. She had tagged on an extra chapter on the end dealing with his death. Musta been really tough for her at the end what with her having divorced him years before and washed her hands of him. :roll:

Classy gold digger STILL uses his surname. That's as good as admitting that if she reverted to her maiden name, no one wud know or care who she was. Not that most people care even with her using his name.

She's up there with Heather Mills in my list of cunts who need a dose of karma
 
Problem is sensationalism sells - if a story isn't juicy then we, the general public, just aren't interested. Media today is all about making as much money as possible - if they can get a juicy story on a well known celebrity or so candid shots of said person in a compromising position then they know it will bring them views - and view = ad revenue

Sad state of affairs but will not get any better as the media must be self-regulated
 
I'm watching a small documentary called The Killings Of Tony Blair. Part of his job now is having dictators pay him a ton of money for him to show them in a good light in the western media, in this case it was just after one ordered the shooting of protesters in the street. Early in his political career he got chummy with Rupert Murdoch to construct what should go in his papers.

Remember that scene in Good Morning Vietnam where the twins scrub out all the news he's not allowed to mention? That I'm guessing is how it is everywhere. Fox news more so, less so in Private Eye.
 
Old Thread: Hello . There have been no replies in this thread for 365 days.
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant.
Perhaps it would be better to start a new thread instead.
Back
Top Bottom