Spoon's die cast update

Is this the other Land Speeder mail away that I have a vague memory of you mentioning [mention]spoons[/mention] ? https://starwarsforum.co.uk/viewtopic.php?f=32&t=36082&start=15

Ian
 
Palifan said:
Is this the other Land Speeder mail away that I have a vague memory of you mentioning @spoons ? https://starwarsforum.co.uk/viewtopic.php?f=32&t=36082&start=15

Ian

Hi Ian, that is the other one. JC Penney definitely sold those, not sure if anyone else sold that box.
Pulsar said:
That is an outstanding collection of diecast Spoons! :shock: 8)
The best one i have seen, many thanks for sharing.

I notice you have the excellent small wings DV on regular card. I moved mine on last year and seeing yours has made me pine.
Your Vader is similarly jettisoned to my old one, have you ever seen an example with a Vader still inside the cockpit?

Kind regards
Paul

Thanks Paul, a shame you moved on those pieces but needs must. I don't think the inner tray was ever designed for the small wing TIE so odds are that Vader will fall out over time. Not sure that I've seen a TIE card with a loose Vader so maybe the bubble was slightly smaller, Vader glued or more likely just coincidence

The production bubble had an inner tray to keep Vader in
 
spoons said:
Palifan said:
Is this the other Land Speeder mail away that I have a vague memory of you mentioning @spoons ? https://starwarsforum.co.uk/viewtopic.php?f=32&t=36082&start=15

Ian

Hi Ian, that is the other one. JC Penney definitely sold those, not sure if anyone else sold that box.
Pulsar said:
Good to know and do let me know if you're ever after one :D

Ian
 
Your collection looks fantastic Andy, you can't beat a bit of die-cast! Nice to see the Doctor Who 'Sugar Smacks' badges there too!!
 
peekaygee73 said:
Your collection looks fantastic Andy, you can't beat a bit of die-cast! Nice to see the Doctor Who 'Sugar Smacks' badges there too!!


Thanks Paul, I never knew the origin of those badges. They were a hand me down from my cousin. Off to google 70s sugar smacks now
 
Palifan said:
spoons said:
Palifan said:
Is this the other Land Speeder mail away that I have a vague memory of you mentioning @spoons ? https://starwarsforum.co.uk/viewtopic.php?f=32&t=36082&start=15

Ian

Hi Ian, that is the other one. JC Penney definitely sold those, not sure if anyone else sold that box.
Pulsar said:
Good to know and do let me know if you're ever after one :D

Ian

Let me know if you are selling as I'd be tempted
 
Let me know if you are selling as I'd be tempted
[/quote]


I could be although I've no idea what these would go for, any thoughts then let me know.

Ian
 
Palifan said:
Let me know if you are selling as I'd be tempted


I could be although I've no idea what these would go for, any thoughts then let me know.

Ian
[/quote]

I'll have a think and get back to you, but I'm not desperate for one to in no rush
 
This is most definitely the best die cast collection I have seen and the way you have displayed them is awesome, out of curiosity spoons how long did it take to acquire all of these?
 
DarthHamblin said:
This is most definitely the best die cast collection I have seen and the way you have displayed them is awesome, out of curiosity spoons how long did it take to acquire all of these?


Thanks DarthHamblin that is appreciated. I put a carded run together and focussed on TIE fighters for around 10-15 years so roughly one a year on that basis but had a loose run since the 90s. The other runs I've mostly put together in the last 5-6 years or so, since I started the website.

With only 11 ships it's relatively easy to put a set together but some of the foreign cards are very rare
 
Brilliant mate, you say relatively easy. That set takes time and dedication and like I said before it's very impressive 👍
 
DarthHamblin said:
Brilliant mate, you say relatively easy. That set takes time and dedication and like I said before it's very impressive 👍

Thnaks again :)
 
Old Thread: Hello . There have been no replies in this thread for 365 days.
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant.
Perhaps it would be better to start a new thread instead.
Back
Top Bottom