Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Vintage Star Wars Collecting
Vintage Collecting Chat
Resealed figure discovery debate - G.Kurtz Palitoy VC Jawa.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Grant_C" data-source="post: 398088" data-attributes="member: 2991"><p>This is interesting. It is known that TT had baggies of these. It is believed that these baggies were used for TFP 45back. </p><p></p><p>Baggies are useful as they can be (were) a cheaper alternative to MOC and have C10 figures.</p><p></p><p>Look at this fella:</p><p></p><p>https://www.ebay.co.uk/ulk/itm/252351099132</p><p></p><p>Could that AFA code be useful to see what they destroyed this figure from?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Grant_C, post: 398088, member: 2991"] This is interesting. It is known that TT had baggies of these. It is believed that these baggies were used for TFP 45back. Baggies are useful as they can be (were) a cheaper alternative to MOC and have C10 figures. Look at this fella: https://www.ebay.co.uk/ulk/itm/252351099132 Could that AFA code be useful to see what they destroyed this figure from? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Vintage Star Wars Collecting
Vintage Collecting Chat
Resealed figure discovery debate - G.Kurtz Palitoy VC Jawa.
Top
Bottom