Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Vintage Star Wars Collecting
Vintage Collecting Chat
Resealed figure discovery debate - G.Kurtz Palitoy VC Jawa.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="**Delboy75**" data-source="post: 260804" data-attributes="member: 554"><p>No Jason, Mattias's findings are spot on, my point was a single 'spot' would not be enough to bin the run. It would take more than that, and Mattias has found enough wrong with the C3PO's to have them pulled. </p><p></p><p>My point is if these are rejected cards there will be more than a tiny ink mark error on them, so I'm sure if you guys compare shop ones to Toni's there will be enough differences between them to confirm Mattias's findings are spot on. </p><p></p><p>So no I did not doubt His findings at all, I was pointing out as someone in the industry that company's do not just chuck stuff out for teeny teeny defects. If these cards are rejects I guarantee there are other reasons than that tiny pink ink spot.</p><p></p><p>Someone mentioned a red blob on the reverse of the card by chewie, yes this is a defect but as someone who worked in QA for 15 years and the print industry for almost 7 years I would not expect a whole batch to be pulled for this one defect. There must be other things wrong with them, just like with the c3po.</p><p></p><p>I honestly think its case solved. Toni's defence is pathetic, it's just a case of finding out which cards are rejects and who was/is involved.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="**Delboy75**, post: 260804, member: 554"] No Jason, Mattias's findings are spot on, my point was a single 'spot' would not be enough to bin the run. It would take more than that, and Mattias has found enough wrong with the C3PO's to have them pulled. My point is if these are rejected cards there will be more than a tiny ink mark error on them, so I'm sure if you guys compare shop ones to Toni's there will be enough differences between them to confirm Mattias's findings are spot on. So no I did not doubt His findings at all, I was pointing out as someone in the industry that company's do not just chuck stuff out for teeny teeny defects. If these cards are rejects I guarantee there are other reasons than that tiny pink ink spot. Someone mentioned a red blob on the reverse of the card by chewie, yes this is a defect but as someone who worked in QA for 15 years and the print industry for almost 7 years I would not expect a whole batch to be pulled for this one defect. There must be other things wrong with them, just like with the c3po. I honestly think its case solved. Toni's defence is pathetic, it's just a case of finding out which cards are rejects and who was/is involved. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Vintage Star Wars Collecting
Vintage Collecting Chat
Resealed figure discovery debate - G.Kurtz Palitoy VC Jawa.
Top
Bottom