Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Vintage Star Wars Collecting
Vintage Collecting Chat
My AT-AT Commander Palitoy 45 back - opinions on the seal?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Snaketibe" data-source="post: 555907" data-attributes="member: 7379"><p>It's very hard to be sure of course, however my thoughts are that whilst the damage down the right-hand side of the blister and the lifting of it on the top edge do rightly raise questions regarding its authenticity, if it IS a reseal, it's actually a very good one, as there are no other obvious indicators that I can see on any of the 4 sides under the seals. The lifting at the top could simply be due to a poor original seal, and I've seen damage similar to that down the right-hand side of the blister before on cards which were not reseals. Overall therefore, I *think* it's probably genuine, but I am happy to be corrected by others if I've missed something. The one thing it shouldn't be is a Toy Toni, as according to Mr Palitoy's excellent website, AT-AT Commander cards weren't among the cardbacks Toy Toni used.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Snaketibe, post: 555907, member: 7379"] It's very hard to be sure of course, however my thoughts are that whilst the damage down the right-hand side of the blister and the lifting of it on the top edge do rightly raise questions regarding its authenticity, if it IS a reseal, it's actually a very good one, as there are no other obvious indicators that I can see on any of the 4 sides under the seals. The lifting at the top could simply be due to a poor original seal, and I've seen damage similar to that down the right-hand side of the blister before on cards which were not reseals. Overall therefore, I *think* it's probably genuine, but I am happy to be corrected by others if I've missed something. The one thing it shouldn't be is a Toy Toni, as according to Mr Palitoy's excellent website, AT-AT Commander cards weren't among the cardbacks Toy Toni used. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Vintage Star Wars Collecting
Vintage Collecting Chat
My AT-AT Commander Palitoy 45 back - opinions on the seal?
Top
Bottom