Chewbacca prototype?

To me you can just see remnants of leg markings. So I reckon it's a worn mold, bad pour, certainly not a prototype. The seller deals with a lot of Star Wars so if he/she did think it was 'real' it would have gone to AFA.
 
Yeah i agree. You can see very faint leg markings. I'm sure the seller can see them too from his own photos! :)
 
Hi

Thanks for all your info guys, what about the circle stamp on the bottom of his foot? any idea what that is I have never seen that before on a chewbacca figure any ideas?

cheers
 
I've just checked my Chewbaccas and I also have a no COO Chewbacca with a very faint date marking and a circle on the foot. I think its a Palitoy! I can never tell the difference between the Palitoy and Lili Ledy. I'm sure there is a COO variant collector who can determine which it is. Nothing too exciting though :)
 
A very knowledgeable friend has suggested that this figure MIGHT be from the POTF Classic Edition 4 Pack from 1995!

http://www.rebelscum.com/potf2classicedition4pack.asp

It says that the 4 figures were produced from molds cast directly from the original vintage kenner action figures which could explain the faint COO & the circle on the foot being an ejector pin mark.Does anyone have one of these sets or figure which could confirm this?
 
DM613 said:
o me you can just see debris of leg arrangement. So I account it's a beat cast, bad cascade, absolutely not a ancestor. The agent deals with a lot of brilliant Wars so if he/she did anticipate it was 'absolute' it would accept gone to AFA.

WOW, :shock: ,and i tought my sentences are hard to understand :D :wink:

btw welcome to swfuk

:D
 
jimmymindtricks said:
DM613 said:
o me you can just see debris of leg arrangement. So I account it's a beat cast, bad cascade, absolutely not a ancestor. The agent deals with a lot of brilliant Wars so if he/she did anticipate it was 'absolute' it would accept gone to AFA.

WOW, :shock: ,and i tought my sentences are hard to understand :D :wink:

btw welcome to swfuk

:D

That's because it's a spambot that just rehashes an old post. It's now banned.
 
DarthStanley said:
A very knowledgeable friend has suggested that this figure MIGHT be from the POTF Classic Edition 4 Pack from 1995!

http://www.rebelscum.com/potf2classicedition4pack.asp

It says that the 4 figures were produced from molds cast directly from the original vintage kenner action figures which could explain the faint COO & the circle on the foot being an ejector pin mark.Does anyone have one of these sets or figure which could confirm this?

Well I can't say for sure because i don't own the figures from the classic edition 4-pack but I am sure I remember seeing that the markings were quite clearly defined with a 1995 and a different COO.

I love the look of the classic edition 4-Pack. I've been thinking about picking one up for a while now.
 
I think the leg markings on Classic Edition 4 Pack should be Kenner China (2 lines) on one leg and 1995 LFL on the other.

I still vote No COO Palitoy :)
 
olisuds said:
Well I can't say for sure because i don't own the figures from the classic edition 4-pack but I am sure I remember seeing that the markings were quite clearly defined with a 1995 and a different COO.

I love the look of the classic edition 4-Pack. I've been thinking about picking one up for a while now.

You're right Oli,i've just watched a review of the POTF Classic Edition 4 Pack on youtube & the guys says the figures have 1995 stamped on them!
 
Capetown said:
jimmymindtricks said:
DM613 said:
o me you can just see debris of leg arrangement. So I account it's a beat cast, bad cascade, absolutely not a ancestor. The agent deals with a lot of brilliant Wars so if he/she did anticipate it was 'absolute' it would accept gone to AFA.

WOW, :shock: ,and i tought my sentences are hard to understand :D :wink:

btw welcome to swfuk

:D

That's because it's a spambot that just rehashes an old post. It's now banned.


damn fig this guy would def get aj of my back on the subject

altho its been a while 8)
 
Old Thread: Hello . There have been no replies in this thread for 365 days.
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant.
Perhaps it would be better to start a new thread instead.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom