Bit of a grading error!

Palifan

Sith Lord
Joined
Oct 28, 2012
Messages
4,911
Reaction score
196
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/UK-Star-Wars-Palitoy-R2D2-Artoo-Detoo-12-back-moc-Graded-80-85-85-UKG-AFA-/141285494033?pt=UK_ToysGames_ActionFigures_ActionFigures_JN&hash=item20e5458d11&nma=true&si=rFLndxXTxB7c%252FnxkEQL5t7%252BgnrY%253D&orig_cvip=true&rt=nc&_trksid=p2047675.l2557
 
hahahaha and **** me I made an offer on that piece and didn't even notice pheeeww good job I got turned down... :shock:
 
I thought it went for a lot of money with such a low grade, I really wouldn't be happy if that came back to me but then again the seller does their own share of questionable grade listings.
 
I'm sure UKG would correct this free of charge, that being said it's a big mistake. :roll:
 
Ok, mistakes happen, and someone has entered these numbers in the computer wrong. Surely, in between the sticker being stuck down and the plastic tomb being stuck together, someone should have spotted this error and corrected it. Its a pretty obvious gaff.

These graded cards live and die by their grades. This card is going to be an 80, as the subs are 80-85-85. What if they had made the typo the other way. Given the card an overall of 85, with those subs. It wouldn't look too wrong. How much more would an 85 sell for than an 80. All because of a typing error.

I think its **** like this that is why I am not a fan of grading. Its the same item. Either you like it or you don't.
 
The absolute **** this seller writes to try sell his stuff, a thoroughly deserved mistake from UKG :lol:

Good old Karma coming into play :wink:
 
What an absolute cock end.

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/UK-Star-Wars-Palitoy-Snaggletooth-20-back-moc-from-1978-figure-graded-80-/141298738305?pt=UK_ToysGames_ActionFigures_ActionFigures_JN&hash=item20e60fa481

The figure graded 80 so it must be good.
 
I know, so misleading and why even bother grading that in the first place?!
 

Latest posts

Back
Top