Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Vintage Star Wars Collecting
Vintage Collecting Chat
Long Time suspected FAKE baggies scam / seller
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="finestcomics" data-source="post: 433787" data-attributes="member: 4368"><p>I had left this thread for dead for reasons the site admin crossed the line in addressing my participation and involvement, but since you keep bringing me up repeatedly...</p><p></p><p>I only insisted on a revising the first post since <u>two members of the investigation stated it was not going to be proven that Jeff made them</u>. I wasn't the only person to remark in this thread that there was still a mention in the OP inferring he did. I asked three times for that revision, and even had to supply a screengrab because apparently it wasn't something anyone remembered you writing.</p><p></p><p>The request for clarification on the Fett baggie was because discussion began to emerge about culling these, and possibly destroying them or taking them out of circulation. As the original post made no specific mention if the touch-ups were the extent, I asked if the seals were factory originals. It was also suggested in the pdocast Jeff was going to send these off to UKG - my thought here was if Stephen Ward could confirm the seals were legit, I could offer to assess if a safe removal of the touch-ups was possible. In doing so, these would not be "fake" any longer. Again, this only made sense if the seals were correct - I wasn't asking for that to be answered on the spot if the person responding was unsure, but did ask for clarification for a reason.</p><p></p><p>If asking these things in an attempt to save something vintage from being destroyed, and trying to find a positive in this sordid situation makes me a troll, so be it. </p><p></p><p>But that was my intent. What you call argumentative overlooks the fact I was asking for clarification. I ask you to refrain from painting a picture here of something that isn't - repeating falsehoods doesn't make it any more true.</p><p></p><p>I'm done here.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="finestcomics, post: 433787, member: 4368"] I had left this thread for dead for reasons the site admin crossed the line in addressing my participation and involvement, but since you keep bringing me up repeatedly... I only insisted on a revising the first post since [u]two members of the investigation stated it was not going to be proven that Jeff made them[/u]. I wasn't the only person to remark in this thread that there was still a mention in the OP inferring he did. I asked three times for that revision, and even had to supply a screengrab because apparently it wasn't something anyone remembered you writing. The request for clarification on the Fett baggie was because discussion began to emerge about culling these, and possibly destroying them or taking them out of circulation. As the original post made no specific mention if the touch-ups were the extent, I asked if the seals were factory originals. It was also suggested in the pdocast Jeff was going to send these off to UKG - my thought here was if Stephen Ward could confirm the seals were legit, I could offer to assess if a safe removal of the touch-ups was possible. In doing so, these would not be "fake" any longer. Again, this only made sense if the seals were correct - I wasn't asking for that to be answered on the spot if the person responding was unsure, but did ask for clarification for a reason. If asking these things in an attempt to save something vintage from being destroyed, and trying to find a positive in this sordid situation makes me a troll, so be it. But that was my intent. What you call argumentative overlooks the fact I was asking for clarification. I ask you to refrain from painting a picture here of something that isn't - repeating falsehoods doesn't make it any more true. I'm done here. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Vintage Star Wars Collecting
Vintage Collecting Chat
Long Time suspected FAKE baggies scam / seller
Top
Bottom