Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Vintage Star Wars Collecting
Vintage Reference Library
Comprehensive Guide to Baggies
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Frunkstar" data-source="post: 218326" data-attributes="member: 314"><p><span style="font-size: 26px"><span style="color: #00FF00">Bespin Security Guard (BLACK)</span></span></p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]172183[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]172184[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"><span style="color: rgb(204, 204, 204)">ESB-c, only just adding this now 12.12.21 - it would seem there is also an ESB-c version & I suspect this is likely where the confused Cat IV rarity classification on the SWCA baggie guide came from as this one is a dam site tougher to find than it's ESB-d counterpart below which has been found in huge numbers (screenshot above)</span></span></p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]128763[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>ESB-d - Said to be a Cat IV but IMO is not a Rare baggie at all, but I presume a large cache of these has been found since the SWCA baggie guide was written??, see new info regarding that last statement on the newly added ESB-c version above.</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]128764[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>ESB-h - You could class this one as Cat IV or even V IMO, first one I have ever seen & likely not correct sadly, consider this as a maybe at best & possibly fake =( <span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)">CONFIRMED FAKE</span> & opened / figure removed (from the usual suspect) after tracing it back</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Frunkstar, post: 218326, member: 314"] [SIZE=7][COLOR=#00FF00]Bespin Security Guard (BLACK)[/COLOR][/SIZE] [ATTACH type="full" alt="ESB-c BBSC Andrew Neo.jpg"]172183[/ATTACH] [ATTACH type="full" alt="BBSC SWCA error.png"]172184[/ATTACH] [SIZE=4][COLOR=rgb(204, 204, 204)]ESB-c, only just adding this now 12.12.21 - it would seem there is also an ESB-c version & I suspect this is likely where the confused Cat IV rarity classification on the SWCA baggie guide came from as this one is a dam site tougher to find than it's ESB-d counterpart below which has been found in huge numbers (screenshot above)[/COLOR][/SIZE] [ATTACH type="full" alt="IMGP6941.jpg"]128763[/ATTACH] ESB-d - Said to be a Cat IV but IMO is not a Rare baggie at all, but I presume a large cache of these has been found since the SWCA baggie guide was written??, see new info regarding that last statement on the newly added ESB-c version above. [ATTACH type="full" alt="IMGP6615_zpsc2aefb90.jpg"]128764[/ATTACH] ESB-h - You could class this one as Cat IV or even V IMO, first one I have ever seen & likely not correct sadly, consider this as a maybe at best & possibly fake =( [COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)]CONFIRMED FAKE[/COLOR] & opened / figure removed (from the usual suspect) after tracing it back [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Vintage Star Wars Collecting
Vintage Reference Library
Comprehensive Guide to Baggies
Top
Bottom